Skip to main content

The Terms of Our Surrender Colonialism, Dispossession and the Resistance of the Innu: 9781912250462_epub-22a

The Terms of Our Surrender Colonialism, Dispossession and the Resistance of the Innu
9781912250462_epub-22a
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Terms of Our Surrender
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title
  3. Copyright
  4. Contents
  5. Acknowledgements
  6. Terminology
  7. Glossary
  8. Abbreviations
  9. Maps
  10. Preface
  11. Part One: The Innu
    1. Chapter 1: Innu/Canadian Relations in their Social Context
    2. Chapter 2: The Innu Left to their Fate in Schefferville
    3. Chapter 3: Matimekush Lac John Today
    4. Chapter 4: Legacies of the Past: Barriers to Effective Negotiation
    5. Chapter 5: Racism
  12. Part Two: The Royal Proclamation and Questions of Trust Over Canadian Indigenous Land
    1. Chapter 6: Historical Background
    2. Chapter 7: The Personal Fiduciary Duty
    3. Chapter 8: Bending the Law to the Needs of Settlement
    4. Chapter 9: The Honour of the Crown, the Duty to Consult and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
  13. Part Three: The Modern Treaties and Canada’s Comprehensive Land Claims Policy
    1. Chapter 10: The James Bay Project: ‘The Plot to Drown the Northern Woods’
    2. Chapter 11: The Malouf Judgment – Chief Robert Kanatewat et al. v La Société de Développement de la Baie James et al. et La Commission Hydro-Électrique de Québec [1974] RP 38
    3. Chapter 12: Negotiating the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
    4. Chapter 13: The Aftermath of Signing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
    5. Chapter 14: The Comprehensive Land Claims Policy
  14. Part Four: The Innu Experience of the Comprehensive Land Claims Process
    1. Chapter 15: ‘All that is Left to us is the Terms of our Surrender’: Negotiations to Recover Lost Innu Lands
    2. Chapter 16: The New Dawn Agreement
    3. Chapter 17: The Position of the Innu who Live in Quebec
    4. Chapter 18: Construction and Protest at Muskrat Falls
  15. Part Five: ‘Citizens Plus’ or Parallel Paths?
    1. Chapter 19: Academic Solutions
    2. Chapter 20: Indigenous Solutions
    3. Chapter 21: ‘Citizens Plus’ or Parallel Paths?
  16. Appendix A Text of the Royal Proclamation
  17. Appendix B The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
  18. Bibliography
  19. Index
  20. Back Cover

I was happy because I was always looking forward to going back to our homeland, into the country, because I was a child and I was always excited to see animals, all kinds of animals. It was funny to see those animals, I was happy to see those animals, like beaver, bear, partridge, all these little animals were roaming on the land. I could see them and was pretty excited to see that. I enjoyed eating Indian food a lot – the food from our land. That’s why it makes me happy to think about that – to remember – I was happy to live that life.

Learning from the elders makes me proud of who I am and who we are as a people because there are a lot of bravehearts. We are a very strong people, going to different places on the land, covering long distances, vast areas of our homeland. I have heard people talking about going, for instance, to Nain, to George River, to Goose Bay, to go to other trading posts on the Caniapiscau Lake or up near the Cree land. That tells you the distance they covered and how strong and fit they were. And listening to the elders telling their stories, it’s as if I was there, part of their journey, that’s how I feel and I am very proud of it. We should be proud of our grandparents because they were strong, fit, courageous people, that’s what they were. And the land was a very difficult terrain.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Chapter 11: The Malouf Judgment – Chief Robert Kanatewat et al. v La Société de Développement de la Baie James et al. et La Commission Hydro-Électrique de Québec [1974] RP 38
PreviousNext
Copyright © Human Rights Consortium, 2021
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org