Skip to main content

The Terms of Our Surrender Colonialism, Dispossession and the Resistance of the Innu: 9781912250462_epub-26

The Terms of Our Surrender Colonialism, Dispossession and the Resistance of the Innu
9781912250462_epub-26
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Terms of Our Surrender
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title
  3. Copyright
  4. Contents
  5. Acknowledgements
  6. Terminology
  7. Glossary
  8. Abbreviations
  9. Maps
  10. Preface
  11. Part One: The Innu
    1. Chapter 1: Innu/Canadian Relations in their Social Context
    2. Chapter 2: The Innu Left to their Fate in Schefferville
    3. Chapter 3: Matimekush Lac John Today
    4. Chapter 4: Legacies of the Past: Barriers to Effective Negotiation
    5. Chapter 5: Racism
  12. Part Two: The Royal Proclamation and Questions of Trust Over Canadian Indigenous Land
    1. Chapter 6: Historical Background
    2. Chapter 7: The Personal Fiduciary Duty
    3. Chapter 8: Bending the Law to the Needs of Settlement
    4. Chapter 9: The Honour of the Crown, the Duty to Consult and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
  13. Part Three: The Modern Treaties and Canada’s Comprehensive Land Claims Policy
    1. Chapter 10: The James Bay Project: ‘The Plot to Drown the Northern Woods’
    2. Chapter 11: The Malouf Judgment – Chief Robert Kanatewat et al. v La Société de Développement de la Baie James et al. et La Commission Hydro-Électrique de Québec [1974] RP 38
    3. Chapter 12: Negotiating the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
    4. Chapter 13: The Aftermath of Signing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
    5. Chapter 14: The Comprehensive Land Claims Policy
  14. Part Four: The Innu Experience of the Comprehensive Land Claims Process
    1. Chapter 15: ‘All that is Left to us is the Terms of our Surrender’: Negotiations to Recover Lost Innu Lands
    2. Chapter 16: The New Dawn Agreement
    3. Chapter 17: The Position of the Innu who Live in Quebec
    4. Chapter 18: Construction and Protest at Muskrat Falls
  15. Part Five: ‘Citizens Plus’ or Parallel Paths?
    1. Chapter 19: Academic Solutions
    2. Chapter 20: Indigenous Solutions
    3. Chapter 21: ‘Citizens Plus’ or Parallel Paths?
  16. Appendix A Text of the Royal Proclamation
  17. Appendix B The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
  18. Bibliography
  19. Index
  20. Back Cover

My community gets nothing because they didn’t sign. Why do we have to sign away our rights to be part of the wealth of the country?

The Innu Nation has nine communities – before it was only one. Now it is divided into three groups – west, east and middle. The groups are not all at the same stage. The government plays with them – it doesn’t act in good faith.

I always thought that they were insulting our people in some way because it’s not their land, or they have joint rights on that land. If they don’t have exclusive rights to that land, at least they should have considered our views and be respectful or asked the government if we wanted to surrender our lands – because at least we should have had choices as a society about that. But they don’t insert any provisions in those treaties that affect the rights of the Innu. But they were careless, I believe, but they would say, I heard somewhere, that the Crees or the Inuit were acting under duress, that we were forced to sign this. Well, we were under the same situation and we didn’t surrender our rights.

We are miserable when we see our land given away to others and the privileges they receive when they sign agreements.

It is a big insult what the governments have done to our people. They have insulted our people by letting this happen. By letting other people have our rights, by signing away our rights, the Canadian government has acted. The government gives service with one hand but takes something back with the other – gives programmes and services but takes away our rights.

The government fails to tell the real story about the Indian people.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Part Four: The Innu Experience of the Comprehensive Land Claims Process
PreviousNext
Copyright © Human Rights Consortium, 2021
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org