Skip to main content

Reframing Failure in Digital Scholarship: Acknowledgements

Reframing Failure in Digital Scholarship
Acknowledgements
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeReframing Failure in Digital Scholarship
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Title Page
  2. Copyright
  3. Contents
  4. List of figures
  5. Notes on contributors
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Introduction: reframing failure
  8. Part I: Innovation
    1. 1. Stop lying to yourself: collective delusion and digital humanities grant funding
    2. 2. Risk, failure and the assessment of innovative research
    3. 3. Innovation, tools and ecology
    4. 4. Software at play
  9. Part II: Technology
    1. 5. Brokenness is social
    2. 6. A career in ruins? Accepting imperfection and celebrating failures in digital preservation and digital archaeology
    3. 7. Living well with brokenness in an inclusive research culture: what we can learn from failures and processes in a digital humanities lab
    4. 8. Can we be failing?
  10. Part III: Collaboration
    1. 9. Doing, failing, learning: understanding what didn’t work as a key research finding in action research
    2. 10. Navigating the challenges and opportunities of collaboration
    3. 11. Challenging the pipeline structure: a reflection on the organisational flow of interdisciplinary projects
    4. 12. When optimisation fails us
    5. 13. Reframing ‘reframing’: a holistic approach to understanding failure
  11. Part IV: Institutions
    1. 14. Permission to experiment with literature as data and fail in the process
    2. 15. What to do with failure? (What does failure do?)
    3. 16. The remaining alternatives
    4. 17. Who fails and why? Understanding the systemic causes of failure within and beyond the digital humanities
    5. 18. Experimental publishing: acknowledging, addressing and embracing failure
    6. 19. Writing about research methods: sharing failure to support success
    7. 20. Bridging the distance: confronting geographical failures in digital humanities conferences
  12. Conclusion: on failing
  13. Index

Acknowledgements

This project and book would have been impossible without our wonderful contributing authors; we would like to thank them for trusting us with their inspiring reflections and for their resiliency and professionalism.

We are equally indebted to those whose writing didn’t quite make it into these pages. We’d like to extend our particular thanks to the original contributors of the 2022–23 seminar who we were not – for one reason or another – able to include in this collection, but whose discussions helped shape this book nonetheless.

Special thanks to our publisher, Emma Gallon, for her attentive care and invaluable role in the production of this volume. We’d also like to thank the two anonymous peer reviewers for their thoughtful feedback early in the process.

Anna-Maria would like to thank her co-editor, Michael, for being such a terrific collaborator and for helping see this project through to the end. She would like to thank Jane Winters for being an inspiring mentor and supporting us in this seminar series and publication. Special thanks go to the entire team at DHRH, as well as colleagues from the various projects she has worked on over the years, for reinforcing her belief that digital scholarship is far from a failed discourse, practice and career choice. And to Vassilis, Loukia and David, for being a positive force in her life.

Michael is grateful to Anna-Maria for being a generous and understanding co-editor, without whom this book would not have been completed. He would also like to thank Jane Winters, Naomi Wells, and the rest of the team at the University of London for being so supportive of the project. Thanks go to his parents, Michelle and Victor, for being his first and best editors and to Chris for teaching him to think computationally. And to Lily, for all her love and support.

We hope our efforts as editors of this volume have not failed. But even if they have, this failure remains a labour of love.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Introduction: reframing failure
PreviousNext
© the Authors 2025
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org