Skip to main content

Reframing Failure in Digital Scholarship: List of figures

Reframing Failure in Digital Scholarship
List of figures
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeReframing Failure in Digital Scholarship
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Title Page
  2. Copyright
  3. Contents
  4. List of figures
  5. Notes on contributors
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Introduction: reframing failure
  8. Part I: Innovation
    1. 1. Stop lying to yourself: collective delusion and digital humanities grant funding
    2. 2. Risk, failure and the assessment of innovative research
    3. 3. Innovation, tools and ecology
    4. 4. Software at play
  9. Part II: Technology
    1. 5. Brokenness is social
    2. 6. A career in ruins? Accepting imperfection and celebrating failures in digital preservation and digital archaeology
    3. 7. Living well with brokenness in an inclusive research culture: what we can learn from failures and processes in a digital humanities lab
    4. 8. Can we be failing?
  10. Part III: Collaboration
    1. 9. Doing, failing, learning: understanding what didn’t work as a key research finding in action research
    2. 10. Navigating the challenges and opportunities of collaboration
    3. 11. Challenging the pipeline structure: a reflection on the organisational flow of interdisciplinary projects
    4. 12. When optimisation fails us
    5. 13. Reframing ‘reframing’: a holistic approach to understanding failure
  11. Part IV: Institutions
    1. 14. Permission to experiment with literature as data and fail in the process
    2. 15. What to do with failure? (What does failure do?)
    3. 16. The remaining alternatives
    4. 17. Who fails and why? Understanding the systemic causes of failure within and beyond the digital humanities
    5. 18. Experimental publishing: acknowledging, addressing and embracing failure
    6. 19. Writing about research methods: sharing failure to support success
    7. 20. Bridging the distance: confronting geographical failures in digital humanities conferences
  12. Conclusion: on failing
  13. Index

List of figures

Figure 3.1: TextLab XML editing window. Public domain.

Figure 3.2: TextLab’s diplomatic transcription view, with revision narrative sequences, from the Melville Electronic Library (c. 2019). Public domain.

Figure 3.3: The current Billy Budd manuscript viewer in Edition Crafter. Public domain.

Figure 7.1: ClickUp dashboard created by Pamela Mellen on 24 June 2024 to monitor issues related to access or other broken functionalities of web environments (mainly public websites) that KDL maintains over time. © King’s Digital Lab.

Figure 7.2: Diagram created by the author outlining process of repair with example of issue report and team analysis based on a real-life example. © Arianna Ciula.

Figure 7.3: Illustration created by Neil Jakeman to exemplify a sequence of failures to adjust the 3D printing of complex forms based on sculptures designed by artist Lisa Jamhoury for her work L’Entrée in the Glow3 project. © Neil Jakeman.

Figure 7.4: Diagram drawn by Tiffany Ong summarising KDL workflow around the decommissioning process. Recommendations are socialised with and then approved by KDL Service Level Agreement committee. © King’s Digital Lab.76–77

Figure 9.1: A plan, act, observe, reflect action research cycle diagram. © Arran J. Rees.

Figure 9.2: The Congruence Engine Basecamp, showing the different project working groups. © Arran J. Rees.

Figure 11.1: Example of a data pipeline. © Caio Mello.

Figure 20.1: Map of DH Conferences in 2018. © Nabeel Siddiqui.

Figure 20.2: Histogram of DH Conference distance travelled. © Nabeel Siddiqui.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Notes on contributors
PreviousNext
© the Authors 2025
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org