Skip to main content

Individuals and Institutions in Medieval Scholasticism: Acknowledgements

Individuals and Institutions in Medieval Scholasticism
Acknowledgements
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeIndividuals and Institutions in Medieval Scholasticism
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Contents
  5. Acknowledgements
  6. List of abbreviations
  7. Notes on contributors
  8. Introduction: individuals and institutions in medieval scholasticism
  9. I. Individuals and intellectual traditions: construction and criticism
    1. 1. The fathers of scholasticism: authorities as totems
    2. 2. The unicity of substantial form in the Correctoria corruptorii fratris Thomae of Richard Knapwell, Robert Orford and John of Paris
    3. 3. Italian universities, arts masters and interpreting
    4. 4. Individual and institution in scholastic historiography: Nicholas Trevet
  10. II. Institutions and individuals: organizations and social practices
    1. a. Individuals and organizations
      1. 5. The charismatic leader and the vita religiosa: some observations about an apparent contradiction between individual and institution
      2. 6. An institution made of individuals: Peter John Olivi and Angelo Clareno on the Franciscan experience
      3. 7. Rolando of Cremona and the earliest inquisition depositions of Languedoc
    2. b. Individuals and practices
      1. 8. Robert of Courson’s systematic thinking about early thirteenth-century institutions
      2. 9. ‘Better to let scandal arise than to relinquish the truth’: the cases of conscience of the masters of Paris in the thirteenth century
      3. 10. Of parish priests and hermaphrodites: Robert Holcot’s discussion of Omnis utriusque sexus
      4. 11. The cult of the marriage of Joseph and Mary: the shaping of doctrinal novelty in Jean Gerson’s Josephina (1414–17)
  11. Afterword
  12. Index

Acknowledgements

Predictably enough there are a number of individuals and institutions we would like to thank. First, all our contributors for their patience with a project which has had a long gestation and for their commitment to it. Second, those contributors to the initial sunny conference in June 2015 at St John’s College Oxford whom it was not possible to include in the volume: Charles Burnett, Magnus Ryan and Juhana Toivanen. Those who chaired and commented on our discussions were also enormously helpful: Mary Carruthers, Jean Dunbabin, Kantik Ghosh, Stephen Mossman, Sandy Murray, Lucy Sackville, Cecilia Trifogli and Ian Wei. Third – if we may – each other. This has been an enormously enjoyable and collaborative project from the start. Antonia Fitzpatrick remembers John Sabapathy proposing the idea but the undertaking has been entirely collaborative from beginning to end. The project’s structure was generated together; its introduction written and revised collaboratively; and its articles proofed alongside one another.

There are a number of institutions we would like to thank, not at all distinct from the individuals involved. First, St John’s College, Oxford and University College London, both of which have provided us with physical and intellectual homes for important periods and which have played instrumental roles in the genesis of this project. We hope that Sir Richard Southern would look favourably on this book. Certainly, his presidential portrait at St John’s seemed to. Neither of us knew Southern but he has had an important influence on our thinking. More materially, St John’s and UCL History Department provided the financial support for the ridiculously fun conference which brought everyone together in the first place. John Sabapathy would also like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for granting a research fellowship on thirteenth-century institutionalization during which this project was completed. This was very much appreciated. Second, the Warburg Institute, where we co-ran a scholasticism reading group for several years, including with some contributors to this volume. The Warburg is one of the best places in the world to work on scholasticism and the book was proofed in its spiritual home on the third floor. Third, the Royal Historical Society and the Institute of Historical Research whose New Historical Perspectives series welcomed our proposal for this book and have supported its production so helpfully.

Finally, this book only apparently lacks a dedication since its efficient cause is an individual who so entirely pervades it that acknowledgment would be as gratuitous as it would be unwanted. In all honesty and gratitude, ceci n’est pas une Festschrift.

Antonia Fitzpatrick and John Sabapathy

Eton and Bloomsbury, July 2019

Annotate

Next Chapter
List of abbreviations
PreviousNext
Text © Antonia Fitzpatrick and John Sabapathy 2020
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org