Skip to main content

The 1922 General Election Reconsidered: Acknowledgements

The 1922 General Election Reconsidered
Acknowledgements
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe 1922 General Election Reconsidered
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Series Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of tables
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Introduction
  9. 1.  The party political outlook in October 1918
  10. 2.  The position of the four main parties
  11. 3.  Locally arranged pacts
  12. 4.  ‘There is no Pact – But’
  13. 5.  ‘Co-operation’ in the constituencies
  14. 6.  Impact of the local elections and nomination day
  15. 7.  Defining Coalition Liberal strategy
  16. 8.  Trying to broker a deal with the Conservatives
  17. 9.  Exchanges between the parties after 4 November
  18. 10.  Methods and tone
    1. The manifestos
    2. Local candidates
    3. Getting the message over
    4. The visual look
    5. The women’s vote
    6. Disruption of election meetings
  19. 11.  Final positions
  20. 12.  The day of the election and the hours after
  21. 13.  Results
  22. 14.  Repercussions of the 1922 General Election
  23. Conclusion
  24. Afterword: considerations for British politics
  25. Select list of sources
    1. Private papers and archives
    2. Contemporary publications, printed private papers, diaries, memoirs
    3. Newspapers
    4. Books
    5. Articles
    6. Unpublished theses
  26. Index

Acknowledgements

In the production of this volume, I am indebted to the Lloyd George Archive and particularly to Tony O’Connor for prompting me to take a closer look at the events of the 1922 General Election. I would also like to acknowledge the help and assistance of the staff at the Parliamentary Archives, Churchill College Cambridge, Cambridge University Library, Plymouth University Library, Exeter University Library, the Record Offices at the Isle of Wight Record Office, Bristol Record Office, Kresen Kernow, Devon Record Office, Kent Archive Service, Shropshire Archives, Lancashire Record Office, Liverpool Record Office, Sussex Record Office, London Metropolitan Archives, Dorset History Centre, the Scottish Record Office, the Gloucester Archives, and the Somerset Heritage Centre in supplying materials to contextualise and question the received wisdom from the secondary sources of the 1922 General Election. In reproducing material, despite every effort, it has not been possible to trace and contact every copyright holder, but if they should contact me, I shall see that appropriate acknowledgement is made in any future edition or reprint.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Introduction
PreviousNext
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Nonderivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org