Skip to main content

The 1922 General Election Reconsidered: Chapter 9 Exchanges between the parties after 4 November

The 1922 General Election Reconsidered
Chapter 9 Exchanges between the parties after 4 November
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe 1922 General Election Reconsidered
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Series Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of tables
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Introduction
  9. 1.  The party political outlook in October 1918
  10. 2.  The position of the four main parties
  11. 3.  Locally arranged pacts
  12. 4.  ‘There is no Pact – But’
  13. 5.  ‘Co-operation’ in the constituencies
  14. 6.  Impact of the local elections and nomination day
  15. 7.  Defining Coalition Liberal strategy
  16. 8.  Trying to broker a deal with the Conservatives
  17. 9.  Exchanges between the parties after 4 November
  18. 10.  Methods and tone
    1. The manifestos
    2. Local candidates
    3. Getting the message over
    4. The visual look
    5. The women’s vote
    6. Disruption of election meetings
  19. 11.  Final positions
  20. 12.  The day of the election and the hours after
  21. 13.  Results
  22. 14.  Repercussions of the 1922 General Election
  23. Conclusion
  24. Afterword: considerations for British politics
  25. Select list of sources
    1. Private papers and archives
    2. Contemporary publications, printed private papers, diaries, memoirs
    3. Newspapers
    4. Books
    5. Articles
    6. Unpublished theses
  26. Index

Chapter 9 Exchanges between the parties after 4 November

The threat of full scale hostilities between the parties does appear to have had some impact on the behaviour of Conservative associations. Further challenges to sitting Coalition Liberals did not materialise and Lloyd George’s phantom army was not deployed. Indeed, in Twickenham the Coalition Liberal threat to oppose William Joynson-Hicks evaporated as quickly and mysteriously as it had appeared. In the aftermath of the close of nominations the newspapers and party leaderships attempted to make sense of where the parties stood in respect of each other and the likely outcome of the election. The Sheffield Daily Telegraph expressed satisfaction that Lloyd George had not jeopardised ‘local arrangements’ by ‘producing his strategic reserve of candidates’.1 Indeed, Lloyd George followed the close of nominations at Newcastle on 7 November when he said that he was ready to support any government wrestling with the problems of the peace. By this he clearly meant the Conservatives, as he went on to argue that his intention in securing the election of as many Liberals as possible was to save the government from ‘Die-Hard extremists’.2

The truce, however, had not been maintained entirely. On 8 November the Derby Daily Telegraph revealed that Marshall Freeman (nominated in Ilkeston against the incumbent Coalition Liberal, General J. E. B. Seely) had received a letter of support from Bonar Law.3 Matching Freeman’s eleventh-hour candidature in Ilkeston, Derbyshire, was that of Henry Lorimer in South Derbyshire. The seat had been captured by Coalition Liberal Henry Gregory in 1918 with the benefit of the coupon but he was not standing again in 1922. His Labour opponent in 1918, Samuel Truman, was ready to stand again and the Coalition Liberals had decided to put forward a relatively unknown candidate, Goronwy Owen. That Owen had little to no connection to South Derbyshire, and was closely associated with Lloyd George’s coterie of Welsh Coalition Liberals, alienated him from local supporters of Asquithian Liberalism, and persuaded local Conservatives to put forward their own candidate. Overall, the truce between the Conservatives and the Coalition Liberals had held, but in some circumstances local antagonisms were too strong to contain and Conservative Central Office felt that it had no choice but to support candidates legitimately put forward by local associations.

Notes

  1. 1  ‘The Nominations’, Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 6 November 1922, 7.

  2. 2  ‘Lloyd George’, Dublin Evening Telegraph, 7 November 1922, 1.

  3. 3  ‘The Premier and Ilkeston’, Derby Daily Telegraph, 8 November 1822, 4.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Chapter 10 Methods and tone
PreviousNext
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Nonderivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org