Skip to main content

Refugee Reception in Southern Africa: Bibliography

Refugee Reception in Southern Africa
Bibliography
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeRefugee Reception in Southern Africa
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Series page
  2. Title page
  3. Copyright
  4. Contents
  5. Acknowledgements
  6. List of abbreviations
  7. Introduction
    1. Disparate responses to the reception of refugees
    2. Refugee reception in Southern Africa
      1. Southern Africa as a setting for investigating refugee reception
      2. Country case study selection
      3. Potential limitations of comparative case studies
    3. The structure of the book
    4. Notes
  8. 1.  Framing refugee reception
    1. Understanding reception
      1. The ‘context of reception’ approach
        1. A multi-scalar lens
        2. Reception as a process
      2. Appraisal of the ‘context of reception’ approach
    2. How states understand refugee reception
    3. Understanding reception sites
      1. The refugee camp as a site of reception
      2. The urban space as a site of reception
      3. Links between the two reception sites
    4. The implementation of refugee reception policies
      1. Adopting the theory of norm implementation to investigate refugee reception policies
      2. A multi-scalar understanding of host states’ responses to refugees
      3. A critical reflection on the book’s conceptual framework
    5. Notes
  9. 2.  Refugee reception policies in Africa
    1. The ‘democratic-aslyum’ nexus: shifting policies to refugees in Africa
    2. The role of the global refugee regime in shaping refugee reception policies
      1. Role of the global in the reception of refugees: the refugee camp
      2. Role of the global in the reception of refugees: the urban space
    3. The security and stability nexus
      1. Security and securitisation
        1. Direct security concerns
        2. Indirect security concerns
        3. Securitisation
      2. The concept of stability
        1. The ‘problem’ of refugees and their movement
        2. Stability and the paradox of human movement
    4. Notes
  10. 3.  Investigating state behaviour towards refugees
    1. Overarching methodological stance
    2. Research design
      1. The framing exercise, September 2016
      2. The finalised research design
    3. The data collection stage
      1. Sampling for the key informant interviews
      2. The interview process
      3. Legal and policy documents
      4. Informal interviews and symposia
    4. The analysis stage
    5. Validity, ethics and reflexivity: conducting field research in Southern Africa
      1. Validity and reliability
      2. Positionality
      3. Timing of the research
      4. Ethical considerations relating to the adopted methods
      5. Limitations of the book’s research design
    6. Notes
  11. 4.  Encampment: the maintenance of a camp-based reception in Zambia
    1. The registration of refugees in Zambia
      1. Legal framework and registration procedures in Zambia
      2. Initial reception during the registration period
    2. The encampment approach in Zambia
      1. Ideational factor: the historical legacy of the national legal framework
      2. Material factor: the capacity to receive and host refugees
        1. The separation of refugees from local populations: capacity concerns in urban spaces
        2. The separation of refugees from local populations: capacity concerns in border areas
        3. The separation of refugees from local populations: creating visibility for continued international support
      3. Material and ideational factors: security
        1. Direct security concerns
        2. Indirect security concerns
        3. The construction of refugees as security risks
        4. Securitisation of the ‘opposition’ in Zambia
    3. The initial stage of reception in Zambia: a case of ongoing negotiations between encampment and urban spaces
    4. Notes
  12. 5.  Encampment: post registration in Zambia
    1. Contextualising post-registration reception in Zambia
    2. The post-registration stage in Zambia: the role of the national government and UNHCR in settlements
      1. Material factor: capacity concerns
      2. Ideational factor: the ‘regime refugee’
      3. Institutional and ideational factors: divergence and contestation in approaches to the settlements
        1. The state’s ideational approach to the settlements
        2. Contestation in UNHCR’s approach to the settlements
    3. Official access to the urban space: pathways out of the settlements post registration
      1. Gate passes and urban residence permits
      2. The management of movement
      3. The temporality of access to the urban space
      4. Institutional and ideational factors: contestation and the conceptualisation of refugee movement
        1. Line ministries
        2. UNHCR and its implementing partners
        3. Commissioner for Refugees, Zambian government
    4. Contemporary shifts in refugee policy at the local level: the Mantapala settlement
      1. Mantapala: a ‘whole of society’ approach to refugee reception?
      2. Early warning signs: material and ideational contestation
      3. Conceptualising refugees and refugee reception outside of the camp setting: a step too far?
    5. Post registration in Zambia: a global regime and the ‘regime refugee’ confined to the camp space
    6. Notes
  13. 6.  Free settlement: the maintenance of a free-settlement reception in South Africa
    1. The registration stage in South Africa
      1. Legal framework and registration procedures
      2. The initial reception at the point of registration
    2. The free-settlement approach in South Africa
      1. Material factor: contemporary movements into South Africa
      2. Ideational and institutional factors: the lack of international involvement in the initial stage of refugee reception in South Africa
      3. Ideational factors: the process of nation-building
    3. Reframing free-settlement reception: South Africa 2011 to present
      1. Material and institutional factors affecting the shift in refugee policy
      2. Ideational factor affecting the shift in refugee policy: the increased securitisation of refugees in South Africa
      3. Exclusion from the urban space
    4. The initial stage of reception in South Africa: a slow decline to a conditional and restrictive approach
    5. Notes
  14. 7.  The urban space: post registration in South Africa
    1. The national government and UNHCR in urban spaces post registration
      1. Material factor: state capacity concerns in urban spaces
      2. Material factor: the capacity of UNHCR and the global refugee regime in urban spaces
      3. Ideational factor: a ‘generous reception’ in urban spaces
      4. Ideational factor: the global refugee regime and urban refugees in South Africa
      5. The effect of national-run post-registration reception in urban spaces
    2. Contemporary shifts in refugee policy at the local level: the City of Johannesburg
      1. Decentralisation in South Africa
      2. Ideational and institutional factors at the city level
      3. Continuing contestation
      4. Shift in ideational approach at the city level
      5. Reception at the city level: a mixed bag
    3. Post registration in South Africa: a precarious relationship between long-term guest and host
    4. Notes
  15. 8.  Conclusions and ways forward
    1. Conceptualising reception in the refugee camp and urban spaces
      1. Temporary versus permanent guest status
      2. Negotiating reception: the interplay between levels of reception in urban spaces
      3. The evolving symbiotic relationship between the refugee camp and the urban space
    2. Reconsidering a norm implementation framework for refugee reception
    3. Contributions to wider debates on refugee reception
      1. Confirming the ‘democracy-asylum’ nexus
      2. The peripheral role of the global refugee regime in shaping refugee reception policies in Southern Africa
      3. Evaluating the security and stability nexus
    4. Implications for policy and practice relating to refugee reception
    5. Notes
  16. Bibliography
  17. Index

Bibliography

  • 7NDP. 2018. Seventh National Development Plan 2017–2021. Republic of Zambia. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/8721.pdf.
  • 8NDP. 2022. Eighth National Development Plan, 2022–2026. Republic of Zambia, August.2022. Available: https://www.sh.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/EIGHTH-NATIONAL-DEVELOPMENT-PLAN-2022-2026-05-07-2022.pdf.
  • Abdelaaty, L. E. 2021. Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Abdulai, A. G. and Hickey, S. 2016. The politics of development under competitive clientelism: Insights from Ghana’s education sector. African Affairs, 115(458), 44–72.
  • Abebe, T. T. et al. 2019. The 1969 OAU Refugee Convention at 50: Report. ISS Africa Report, (19), 1–15.
  • Abrahams, C. 2016. Twenty years of social cohesion and nation-building in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 42(1), 95–107.
  • Acharya, A. 2004. How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–75.
  • Adelman, H. 1998. Why refugee warriors are threats. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 18(1), 49–69.
  • Adepoju, A. et al. 2007. Promoting integration through mobility: Free movement and the ECOWAS Protocol. New Issues in Refugee Research, 150. Available: https://www.refworld.org/reference/research/unhcr/2007/en/78362.
  • African Arguments. 2015. The rise and paradoxes of pan-Africanism today. Available: https://africanarguments.org/2015/06/30/the-rise-and-paradoxes-of-pan-africanism-today/15.
  • The African Wealth Report (AWR). 2020. The African Wealth Report. Available: https://www.intellidex.co.za/press-releases/the-african-wealth-report-2020/.
  • Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2000. Means Without End: Notes on Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Agee, J. 2009. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–47.
  • Agier, M. 2008. On the Margins of the World: The Refugee Experience Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Agier, M. 2011. Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Alam, S. 2008. Majority world: Challenging the West’s rhetoric of democracy. Amerasia Journal, 1, 34(1), 88–98.
  • Albert, M. 2010. Governance and prima facie refugee status determination: Clarifying the boundaries of temporary protection, group determination, and mass influx. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(1), 61–91.
  • Alderson, K. 2001. Making sense of state socialization. Review of International Studies, 27(3), 415–33.
  • Aleinikoff, A. 1995. State-centred refugee law: From resettlement to containment. In: Daniel, E. V. and Knudsen, J. C. eds. Mistrusting Refugees. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Aleinikoff, A. and Poellot, S. 2014. The responsibility to solve: The international community and protracted refugee situations. Virginia Journal of International Law, 54(2).
  • Aleinikoff, A. and Zamore, L. 2019. The Arc of Protection: Reforming the International Refugee Regime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Amit, R., 2011. The Zimbabwean documentation process: Lessons learned. ACMS. Available: https://citizenshiprightsafrica.org/the-zimbabwean-documentation-process-lessons-learned/.
  • Amit, R. 2012. No way in: Barriers to access, service and administrative justice at South Africa’s refugee reception offices. ACMS. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3274020.
  • Amit, R. 2015. Queue here for corruption, measuring irregularities in South Africa’s asylum system. Lawyers for Human Rights and ACMS. Available: www.lhr.org.za/sites/lhr.org.za/files/lhracms_report-queue_here_for_corruption-july_2015.pdf.
  • Amuedo-Dorantes, C. et al. 2018. Refugee admissions and public safety: Are refugee settlement areas more prone to crime? IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 11612. Available: https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/11612/refugee-admissions-and-public-safety-are-refugee-settlement-areas-more-prone-to-crime.
  • Anderson, B. 2010. Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society, 24(2), 300–17.
  • Arendt, H. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.
  • Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Arar, R. and FitzGerald, D. S. 2023. The Refugee System: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Asad, A. L. 2015. Contexts of reception, post-disaster migration, and socioeconomic mobility. Population and Environment, 36(3), 279–310.
  • Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. 2001. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1–4.
  • Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. Thematic Networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405.
  • Bakewell, O. 2000. Repatriation and self-settled refugees in Zambia: Bringing solutions to the wrong problems. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(4), 356–73.
  • Bakewell, O. 2002. Review of CORD community services for Angolan refugees in Western Province, Zambia. UNHCR. Available : https ://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/review-cord-community-services-angolan-refugees-western-province-zambia.
  • Bakewell, O. 2004. Migration as a development strategy: A challenge to development NGOs. Informed-NGO Funding and Policy Bulletin 10, 10–22.
  • Bakewell, O. 2007. Keeping them in their place: The ambivalent relationship between development and migration in Africa. Working Paper Series 08. International Migration Institute. Available: https://www.migrationinstitute.org/publications/wp-08-07.
  • Bakewell, O. 2014. Encampment and self-settlement. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–38.
  • Bakewell, O. 2018. Negotiating a space of belonging: A case study from the Zambia-Angolan borderlands. In: Bakewell, O. and Landau, L. B. eds. Forging African Communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 103–26.
  • Bakewell, O. and Jónsson, G. 2011. Migration, mobility, and the African city. IMI Working Papers No. 50. International Migration Institute. Available: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:87e74a2b-81b3-4267-bd17-e5d0e94df889/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=WP50%2BMigration%2Bmobility%2Band%2Bthe%2Bafrican%2Bcity.pdf&type_of_work=Working+paper.
  • Bakken, I. and Rustad, S. 2018. Conflict trends in Africa, 1989–2017. Conflict Trends, 6. Oslo: Peace Research Institute. Available: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/conflict-trends-africa-1989-2017.
  • Ballard, R. et al. 2017. Current dynamics of social cohesion within the city of Johannesburg. Gauteng City Region Observatory (GCRO), Unpublished.
  • Banerjee, P. and Samaddar, R. 2018. Why critical forced migration studies has to be post-colonial by nature. In: Bloch, A. and Dona, G. eds. Forced Migration: Current Issues and Debates. Abingdon: Routledge, 44–59.
  • Barbelet, V. and Wake, C. 2017. Livelihoods in displacement: From refugee perspectives to aid agency response. Humanitarian Policy Group Report. Overseas Development Institute. Available : https ://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/odi/2017/en/119539.
  • Barrientos, A. and Pellissery, S. 2012. Delivering effective social assistance: Does politics matter? Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre Working Paper No. 9. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2141880.
  • Barutciski, M. 2013. The limits to the UNHCR’s supervisory role. In: Simeon, J. C. ed. The UNHCR and the Supervision of International Refugee Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–74.
  • Basok, T. 2009. Counter-hegemonic human rights discourses and migrant rights activism in the US and Canada. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50, 183–205.
  • Bauman, Z. 2002. In the lowly nowherevilles of liquid modernity: Comments on and around Agier. Ethnography, 3(3), 343–9.
  • BBC. 2019. South Africa: How common are xenophobic attacks? BBC News 2 October 2019. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-47800718.
  • Bebbington, A. et al. 2017. Political settlements and the governance of extractive industry: A comparative analysis of the longue durée in Africa and Latin America. ESID Working Paper No. 81. University of Manchester. Available: https://www.effective-states.org/wp-content/uploads/working_papers/final-pdfs/esid_wp_81_bebbington_et_al.pdf.
  • Becker, H. S. 2009. How to find out how to do qualitative research. International Journal of Communication, 3, 545–53.
  • Bennett, A. 2004. Case study methods: Design, use, and comparative advantages. In: Sprinzand, D. F. and Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. eds. Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 19–55.
  • Bernard, R. H. 2011. Research Methods in Anthropology. Lanham: Altamira Press.
  • Betts, A. 2009a. Development assistance and refugees. Towards a north-south grand bargain? Forced Migration Policy Briefing 2. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre (RSC).
  • Betts, A. 2009b. Forced Migration and Global Politics. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Betts, A. 2013a. Survival Migration: Failed Governance and the Crisis of Displacement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Betts, A. 2013b. Regime complexity and international organizations: UNHCR as a challenged institution. Global Governance, 19(1), 69–81.
  • Betts, A. 2014. From persecution to deprivation: How refugee norms adapt at implementation. In: Betts, A. and Orchard, P. eds. Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–49.
  • Betts, A. and Kaytaz, E. 2009. National and international responses to the Zimbabwean exodus: Implications for the refugee protection regime. New Issues in Refugee Research, Paper No 175. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/afr/research/working/4a76fc8a9/national-international-responses-zimbabwean-exodus-implications-refugee.html.
  • Betts, A. and Orchard, P. 2014. Implementation and World Politics- How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Betts, A. et al. 2017. Refugee Economies: Forced Displacement and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Betts, A. et al. 2018. Self-reliance in Kalobeyei? Socio-economic Outcomes for Refugees in North-West Kenya. Oxford: RSC.
  • Betts, A. et al. 2019. Refugee Economies in Uganda: What Difference Does the Self-reliance Model Make? Oxford: RSC.
  • Bilotta, N. 2020. Anti-oppressive social work research: Prioritising refugee voices in Kakuma refugee camp. Ethics and Social Welfare,14(4), 397–414.
  • Black, R. 1998. Refugee camps not really reconsidered: A reply to Crisp and Jacobsen. Forced Migration Review, 3, Oxford: RSC.
  • Bloch, A. and Donà, G. 2018. Forced migration: Setting the scene. In: Bloch, A. and Donà, G. eds. Forced Migration: Current Issues and Debates. Abingdon: Routledge, 1–18.
  • Bloemraad, I. 2006. Becoming a citizen in the United States and Canada: Structured mobilization and immigrant political incorporation. Social Forces, 85(2), 667–95.
  • Boru, T. 2018. The impact of industry concentration on performance, exploring a comprehensive bank performance model: The case of the Ethiopian banking sector. PhD Thesis, University of South Africa.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Brosché, J. and Nilsson, M. 2005. Zambian Refugee Policy: Security, Repatriation and Local Integration. Available: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1149513/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  • Bryman, M. A. H. A. 2004. Handbook of Data Analysis. London: Sage.
  • Bucklaschuk, J. 2015. A Literature Review of Local Partnerships and Welcoming Community Strategies. Winnipeg: Immigration Partnership Winnipeg.
  • Burnell, P. 2005. From Low-conflict Polity to Democratic Civil Peace? Explaining Zambian Exceptionalism. Occasional Paper 58. University of Warwick. Available: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/896/1/WRAP_Burnell_7270220-180609-zambiaconflictas2.pdf.
  • Buzan, B. et al. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Cadge, W. and Ecklund, E. H. 2007. Immigration and religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 359–79.
  • Canefe, N. 2010. The fragmented nature of the international refugee regime and its consequences: A comparative analysis of the applications of the 1951 convention. In: Simeon, J. C. ed. Critical Issues in International Refugee Law: Strategies Toward Interpretative Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–210.
  • Cannon, B. J. and Fujibayashi, H. 2018. Security, structural factors and sovereignty: Analysing reactions to Kenya’s decision to close the Dadaab refugee camp complex. African Security Review, 27(1), 20–41.
  • Cantor, D. J. and Chikwanha, F. 2019. Reconsidering African refugee law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 31(2–3), 182–260.
  • Carciotto, S., 2018. The regularization of Zimbabwean migrants: A case of permanent temporariness. African Human Mobility Review, 4(1), 1101–16.
  • Carciotto, S. and Ferraro, F. 2020. Building blocks and challenges for the implementation of the Global Compact on Refugees in Africa. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 8(1), 83–95.
  • Carciotto, S. and Mavura, M. 2022. The Evolution of Migration Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Emerging Themes and New Challenges. Cape Town: Scalabrini Institute for Human Mobility in Africa Report.
  • Castles, S. 2015. International human mobility: Key issues and challenges. In: Castles, S. et al. eds. Social Transformation and Migration: National and Local Experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. New York: Springer, 3–14.
  • Chabal, P. and Daloz, J. P. 1999. Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument. London: International African Institute.
  • Chapotera, S. 2018. Assessing opportunities and barriers of refugee local integration in Malawi. MSc Dissertation, University of London.
  • Chatzipanagiotidou, E. and Murphy. F. 2022. Exhibiting displacement: Refugee art, methodological dubiety and the responsibility (not) to document loss. In: Grabska, K. and Clark-Kazak, C. eds. Documenting Displacement: Questioning Methodological Boundaries in Forced Migration Research. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 81–103.
  • Cheeseman, N. 2017. Zambia slides towards authoritarianism as IMF props up government. The Conversation. Available: https://theconversation.com/zambia-slides-towards-authoritarianism-as-imf-props-up-government-79533.
  • Chekero, T. 2023. Borders and boundaries in daily urban mobility practices of refugees in Cape Town, South Africa. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42(3), 361–81.
  • Chiasson, S. 2015. Refugee freedom of movement restricted in Zambia. Urban Refugees.Org. Available: http://urban-refugees.org/debate/refugee-freedom-movement-restricted-zambia/.
  • Chimni, B. S. 2009. The birth of a ‘discipline’: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee studies, 22(1), 11–29.
  • Chitupila, P. 2010. Workshop discussion on refugee status determination (RSD) and rights in Southern and East Africa. Uganda, 16–17 November 2010. Oxford: RSC. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/dp-rsd-zambia-2010.pdf.
  • Chkam, H. 2016. Aid and the perpetuation of refugee camps: The case of Dadaab in Kenya 1991–2011. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(2), 79–97.
  • City of Johannesburg. 2013. 2012/16 Integrated Development Plan: 2013/14 Review. Johannesburg: City of Johannesburg. Available: https://www.joburg.org.za/documents_/Documents/Intergrated%20Development%20Plan/2013-16%20IDP%2017may2013%20final.pdf.
  • City of Johannesburg. 2017. Presentation slides from the Migration Sub-Unit, City of Johannesburg on Social Development, 18 November 2017.
  • Civicus. 2017. Zambia: State of Emergency signifies worrying signs for civic space. Zambia Council for Social Development. Available: https://www.civicus.org/index.php/media-resources/media-releases/2901-zambia-state-of-emergency-signifies-worrying-signs-for-civic-space.
  • Clark-Kazak, C. 2017. Ethical considerations: Research with people in situations of forced migration. Refuge, 33(2), 11–17.
  • Clark-Kazak, C. 2021. Ethics in forced migration research: Taking stock and potential ways forward. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 9(3), 125–38.
  • Clark-Kazak, C. 2023. Research Across Borders: An Introduction to Interdisciplinary, Cross-cultural Methodology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Cohen, D. and Crabtree, B. 2006. Using Qualitative Methods in Healthcare Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Designing, Writing, Reviewing and Reporting Qualitative Research. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
  • Collier, D. 1995. Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: The case of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 461–6.
  • Collier, D. 2011. Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–30.
  • Collier, D. and Mahoney, J. 1996. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49(1), 56–91.
  • Collyer, M. 2014. Geographies of forced migration. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 112–26.
  • Collyer, M. and King, R. 2016. Narrating Europe’s migration and refugee ‘crisis’. Human Geography: A New Radical Journal, 9(2), 1–12.
  • Cortell, A. P. and Davis, J. W. 2005. When norms clash: International norms, domestic practices, and Japan’s internalisation of the GATT/WTO. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 3–25.
  • Corti, L. et al. 2000. Confidentiality and informed consent: Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3).
  • Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
  • Crisp, J. 2000. Africa’s refugees: Patterns, problems and policy challenges. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper 28. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/3ae6a0c78/africas-refugees-patterns-problems-policy-challenges-jeff-crisp.html.
  • Crisp, J. 2003. No solution in sight: The problem of protracted refugee situations in Africa. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper 75. UNHCR, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.
  • Crisp, J. 2004. The local integration and local settlement of refugees: A conceptual and historical analysis. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper 102. UNHCR, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.
  • Crisp, J. 2006. Forced displacement in Africa: Dimensions, difficulties, and policy directions. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper 126. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/afr/research/working/44b7b758f/forced-displacement-africa-dimensions-difficulties-policy-directions-jeff.html.
  • Crisp, J. 2008. Beyond the nexus: UNHCR’s evolving perspective on Refugee protection and international migration. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper 155. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/4818749a2/beyond-nexus-unhcrs-evolving-perspective-refugee-protection-international.html.
  • Crisp, J. 2010. Forced displacement in Africa: Dimensions, difficulties, and policy directions. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(3), 1–27.
  • Crisp, J. 2015. Too much information. Forced Migration Current Awareness, guest post, 11 February. Available: https://fm-cab.blogspot.com/search?q=jeff+crisp+too+much+information.
  • Crisp, J. 2017. Finding space for protection: An inside account of the evolution of UNHCR’s urban refugee policy. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 33(1), 87–96.
  • Crisp, J. and Jacobsen, K. 1998. Refugee camps reconsidered. Forced Migration Review, 3. Oxford: RSC.
  • Crisp, J. and Kiragu, E. 2010. Refugee protection and international migration. A review of UNHCR’s role in Malawi, Mozambique and South Africa. UNHCR PDES. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/4c629c4d9.html.
  • Crook, R. C. 2003. Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: The politics of local–central relations. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(1), 77–88.
  • Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.
  • Crouch, M. and McKenzie, H. 2006. The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–99.
  • Crush, J. and Chikanda, A. 2014. Forced Migration in Southern Africa. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 554–70.
  • Crush, J. et al. 2017. Benign neglect or active destruction? A critical analysis of refugee and informal sector policy and practice in South Africa. African Human Mobility Review, 3(2), 751–82.
  • d’Orsi, C. 2019. Refugee camps versus urban refugees: what’s been said – and done. The Conversation. Available: https://theconversation.com/refugee-camps-versus-urban-refugees-whats-been-said-and-done-126069.
  • Da Costa, R. 2006. Rights of refugees in the context of integration: Legal standards and recommendations. UNHCR DIPS. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/44bb90882.pdf.
  • Daily Maverick, 2020a. Frozen futures: The uncertain and inhumane fate of Angolan refugees in SA. Daily Maverick 6 February 2008. Available: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-02-06-frozen-futures-the-uncertain-and-inhumane-fate-of-angolan-refugees-in-sa/.
  • Daley, P. 2013. Refugees, IDPs and citizenship rights: The perils of humanitarianism in the African Great Lakes region. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 893–912.
  • Darling, J. 2009. Becoming bare life: Asylum, hospitality, and the politics of encampment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 649–65.
  • Darling, J. 2017. Forced migration and the city: Irregularity, informality, and the politics of presence. Progress in Human Geography, 41(2), 178–1.
  • Darwin, C. 2005. Report on the Situation of Refugees in Zambia. AMERA. Available: https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20_10_2014_09_30_27_Report-Refugees-Zambia.pdf.
  • De Haas, H. 2009. Mobility and human development. UNDP, Human Development Research Paper, 2009/1. Available: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/mobility-and-human-development.
  • de Wet, T. et al. 2011. Poor housing, good health: A comparison of formal and informal housing in Johannesburg, South Africa. International Journal of Public Health, 56(6), 625–33.
  • Deardorff, S. 2009. How long is too long? Questioning the legality of long-term encampment through a human rights lens. Oxford RSC, Working paper series no. 54. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp54-how-long-too-long-2009.pdf.
  • Deere, C. 2009. The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Delaney, D. and Leitner, H. 1997. The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93–7.
  • Derrida, J. 2000. Hospitality. Angelaki, 5(3), 3–18.
  • Derrida, J. 2005. The principle of hospitality. In: Derrida, J. ed. Paper Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 66–9.
  • Derrida, J. and Dufourmantelle, A. 2000. Of Hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • DHA. 2016a. Green Paper on international migration for South Africa. Department of Home Affairs, June 2016. Available: http://www.dha.gov.za/files/GreenPaper_on_InternationalMigration-%2022062016.pdf.
  • DHA. 2016b. 2015 Asylum statistics; Analysis and trends – presentation to the Portfolio Committee of Homes Affairs. Department of Home Affairs. Available: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/160308Asylum.pdf.
  • DHA. 2017. White Paper on International Migration for South Africa. Department of Home Affairs, July 2017. Available: http://www.dha.gov.za/WhitePaperonInternationalMigration-20170602.pdf.
  • Diken, B. and Laustsen, C. B. 2005. The Culture of Exception: Sociology Facing the Camp. London: Routledge.
  • Donger, E. et al. 2017. Refugee Youth in Lusaka: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Health and Wellbeing. UNHCR et al. Available: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2464/2018/05/UNHCR-ZAMBIA-Report1.pdf.
  • Donnelly, F. 2017. In the name of (de)securitization: Speaking security to protect migrants, refugees and internally displaced persons? International Review of the Red Cross, 99(904), 241–61.
  • DTS. 2014. Field evaluation of local integration of former refugees in Zambia. U.S. Department of State. Available: https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/235057.pdf.
  • ESRC. 2017. Refugee reception and integration. Available: https://esrc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/evidence-briefings/refugee-reception-and-integration/.
  • Essed, P. and Wesenbeek, R. 2004. Contested refugee status: Human rights, ethics and social responsibilities. In: Essed, P. et al. eds. Refugees and the Transformation of Societies: Agency, Policies, Ethics, and Politics (Vol. 13). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Fábos, A. and Kibreab, G. 2007. Urban refugees: Introduction. Refuge: Canada’s Periodical on Refugees, 24(1), 1–19.
  • Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Fauvelle-Aymar, C. and Segatti, A. 2011. People, space and politics: An exploration of factors explaining the 2008 anti-foreigner violence in South Africa. In: Landau, L. B. ed. Exorcising the Demons Within: Xenophobia, Violence, and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
  • Fedyuk, O. and Zentai, V. 2018. The interview in migration studies: A step towards a dialogue and knowledge co-production? In: Zapata-Barrero, R. and Yalaz, E. eds. Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies. New York: Springer Publishing, 171–88.
  • Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. 2015. South-South Educational Migration, Humanitarianism and Development: Views from the Caribbean, North Africa and the Middle East. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. 2016. Refugee–refugee relations in contexts of overlapping displacement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Available: https://www.ijurr.org/spotlight-on/the-urban-refugee-crisis-reflections-on-cities-citizenship-and-the-displaced/refugee-refugee-relations-in-contexts-of-overlapping-displacement/.
  • Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. 2019. Looking forward: Disasters at 40. Disasters, 43, 36–60.
  • Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. 2020. Introduction: Recentering the South in studies of migration. Migration and Society, 3(1), 1–18.
  • Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Berg, M. L. 2018. Inaugural editorial. Migration and Society, 1(1), 5–7.
  • Field, J. R. C. 2010. Bridging the gap between refugee rights and reality: A proposal for developing international duties in the refugee context. International Journal of Refugee Law, 22(4), 512–57.
  • Fielden, A. 2008. Local integration: An under-reported solution to protracted refugee situations. New Issues in Refugee Research, 158. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/486cc99f2/local-integration-under-reported-solution-protracted-refugee-situations.html.
  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917.
  • FitzGerald, D. S. 2019. Refuge Beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Flahaux, M. L. and De Haas, H. 2016. African migration: Trends, patterns, drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1), 1–25.
  • Flick, U. 2006. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Flick, U. ed. 2009. The Sage Qualitative Research Kit: Collection. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–45.
  • Forsythe, D. P. 2001. Humanitarian protection: The International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. International Review of the Red Cross, 83(843), 675–98.
  • Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Freier, L. F., Micinski, N. R. and Tsourapas, G. 2021. Refugee commodification: The diffusion of refugee rent-seeking in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 42(11), 2747–66.
  • Frischkorn, R. S. 2013. We just aren’t free: Urban refugees and integration in Lusaka, Zambia. PhD Thesis, American University. Available: https://search.proquest.com/openview/53a80b73e20383339aec87787cf8fba3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
  • Frischkorn, R. S. 2015. Political economy of control: Urban refugees and the regulation of space in Lusaka, Zambia. Economic Anthropology, 2(1), 205–23.
  • Frontline Defenders. 2018. Creeping towards authoritarianism? Impacts on human rights defenders and civil society in Zambia. Available: https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/creeping-towards-authoritarianism.
  • Gerring, J. 2008. Case selection for case-study analysis: Qualitative and quantitative techniques. In: Box-Steffensmeier, J. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Vol. 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 645–84.
  • Gill, N. et al. 2011. Introduction: Mobilities and forced migration. Mobilities, 6(3), 301–16.
  • Glasman, J. 2017. Seeing like a refugee agency: A short history of UNHCR classification in Central Africa (1961–2015). Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(2), 337–62.
  • Grabska, K. and Clark-Kazak, C. 2022. Documenting Displacement: Questioning Methodological Boundaries in Forced Migration Research. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Grant, A. 2018. Doing Excellent Social Research with Documents: Practical Examples and Guidance for Qualitative Researchers. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Gray, D. E. 2004. Doing Research in the Real World. London: Sage.
  • Gray, D. E. 2013. Doing Research in the Real World. London: Sage.
  • Grindheim, K. A. 2013. Exploring the impacts of refugee camps on host communities: A Case Study of Kakuma Host Community in Kenya. MA Thesis, University of Agder.
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2003. Colonial Subjects: Puerto Ricans in a Global Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2004. Race and ethnicity or racialized ethnicities? Identities within global coloniality. Ethnicities, 4(3), 315–36.
  • Guarnizo, L. E. 2011. The fluid, multi-scalar, and contradictory construction of citizenship. In: Smith, M. P. and McQuarrie, M. eds. Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 11–38.
  • Guarnizo, L. E. et al. 1999. Mistrust, fragmented solidarity, and transnational migration: Colombians in New York City and Los Angeles. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 367–96.
  • Hagen, J. J., Michelis, I., Eggert, J. P. and Turner, L. 2023. Learning to say ‘No’: Privilege, entitlement and refusal in peace, (post) conflict and security research. Critical Studies on Security, 11(2), 1–19.
  • Hammerstad, A. 2010. UNHCR and the securitisation of forced migration. In: Betts, A. and Loescher, G. eds. Refugees in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hammerstad, A. 2012. Securitisation from below: The relationship between immigration and foreign policy in South Africa’s approach to the Zimbabwe crisis. Conflict, Security & Development, 12(1), 1–30.
  • Handmaker, L. A. et al. 2008. Advancing Refugee Protection in South Africa (Human Rights in Context, Vol. 2). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Hansen, A. 1979. Once the running stops: Assimilation of Angolan refugees into Zambian border villages. Disasters, 3(4), 369–74.
  • Hansen, A. 1982. Self-settled rural refugees in Africa: The case of Angolans in Zambian villages. In: Hansen, A. and Oliver-Smith, A. eds. Involuntary Migration and Resettlement: The Problems and Responses of Dislocated People. New York: Routledge.
  • Hansen, A. 1990. Refugee self-settlement versus settlement on government schemes: The long-term consequences for security, integration and economic development of Angolan refugees (1966–1989) in Zambia. Discussion Paper-United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 17. Available: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/421067?ln=en.
  • Harrell-Bond, B. 1998. Camps: Literature Review. Forced Migration Review, 2. Available: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/camps/harrellbond.pdf.
  • Hayden, B. 2006. What’s in a name? The nature of the individual in refugee studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19(4), 471–87.
  • Hentschel, J. 1998. Distinguishing between types of data and methods of collecting them. Policy Research Working Papers No. 1914 (World Bank). Available: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/575761468766463068/pdf/multi-page.pdf.
  • The Herald. 2023. Motsoaledi’s Decision to end ZEP Invalid and Unconstitutional, Rules High Court. The Herald, Bernadette Wicks, 28 June.2023. Available: https://www.herald.co.zw/motsoaledis-decision-to-end-zep-invalid-and-unconstitutional-rules-high-court/.
  • Hickey, S. et al. 2015. (Introduction) Exploring the politics of inclusive development: Towards a new conceptual approach. In: Hickey, S. et al. eds. The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–34.
  • Horst, C. 2004. Money and mobility: Transnational livelihood strategies of the Somali diaspora. Global Migration Perspectives No. 9. Available: https://www.refworld.org/docid/42ce49684.html.
  • Horwood, C. 2009. In pursuit of the southern dream: Victims of necessity, assessment of the irregular movement of men from East Africa and the Horn to South Africa. Available: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iomresearchassessment.pdf.
  • Hove, M. et al. 2013. The urban crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A threat to human security and sustainable development. Stability, 2(1), 1–14.
  • Hovil, L. 2007. Self-settled refugees in Uganda: An alternative approach to displacement? Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 599–620.
  • Hovil, L. 2016. Refugees, Conflict and the Search for Belonging. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hovil, L. and Maple, N. 2022. Local integration: A durable solution in need of restoration? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 41(2), 238–66.
  • HPN/ODI. 2018. Special feature: Humanitarian response in urban areas. Available: https://odihpn.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/HE71_revised.pdf.
  • Hurd, I. 2008. Constructivism. In: Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298–316.
  • Hyndman, J. 2000. Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hyndman, J. and Giles, W. 2011. Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(3), 361–79.
  • Hyndman, J. and Mountz, A. 2008. Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe. Govern. Opposite, 43(2), 249–69.
  • ICG. 1999. Burundi’s Peace Process: The Road from Arusha, Central Africa Report, 12, November 1999. Available: https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/burundi/burundis-peace-process-road-arusha.
  • IFC. 2018. Kakuma as a marketplace: A consumer and market study of a refugee camp and town in northwest Kenya. Available: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/0f3e93fb-35dc-4a80-a955-6a7028d0f77f/20180427_Kakuma-as-a-Marketplace_v1.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=mc8eL2K.
  • Imenda, S. 2014. Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185–95.
  • Jackson, R. et al. 2019. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jacobsen, K. 2002. Can refugees benefit the state? Refugee resources and African statebuilding. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(4), 577–96.
  • Jacobsen, K. 2005. The Economic Life of Refugees. Boulder, CO: Kumarian Press.
  • Jacobsen, K. 2017. Refugees in towns: Experiences of integration. Forced Migration Review, (56), 78–9.
  • Jamal, A. 2000. Minimum standards and essential needs in protracted refugee situations. A review of the UNHCR programme in Kakuma, Kenya. Available: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/151A73B63C254DE5C12571F800418928-UNHCR-Nov2000.pdf.
  • Jamal, A. 2003. Camps and freedoms: Long-term refugee situations in Africa. Forced Migration Review, 16(1), 4–6.
  • Jansen, B. J. 2016. The protracted refugee camp and the consolidation of a ‘humanitarian urbanism’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Available: https://www.ijurr.org/spotlight-on/the-urban-refugee-crisis-reflections-on-cities-citizenship-and-the-displaced/the-protracted-refugee-camp-and-the-consolidation-of-a-humanitarian-urbanism/.
  • Jaquenod, A. M. 2014. From the realist and liberal state to state fetishism in International Relations. The case of Argentine international insertion in the 1990s. Proceedings of the FLACSO-ISA Joint International Conference, July 2014. Available: http://web.isanet.org/Web/Conferences/FLACSO-ISA%20BuenosAires%202014/Archive/b86ae12e-b84c-4f9b-b888-356e43a9d488.pdf.
  • Jaworsky, B. et al. 2012. New perspectives on immigrant contexts of reception. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(1), 78–88.
  • Jenkins, F. and de la Hunt, L. A. 2011. Detaining asylum-seekers: Perspectives on proposed reception centres for asylum-seekers in South Africa. In: Handmaker, J. et al. eds. Advancing Refugee Protection in South Africa (Vol. 2). New York: Berghahn Books, 167–85.
  • Jepson, N. and Henderson, J. 2016. Critical transformations: Rethinking Zambian development. Available: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/media/36607/download?attachment.
  • Job, B. L. and Shesterinina, A. 2014. China as a global norm shaper. In: Betts, A. and Orchard, P. eds. Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 144–59.
  • Johnson, C. 2015. Failed asylum seekers in South Africa: Policy and practice. African Human Mobility Review, 1(2), 203–29.
  • Johnson, C. and Carciotto, S. 2018. The state of the asylum system in South Africa. In: O’Sullivan, M. and Stevens, D. eds. 2017. States, the Law and Access to Refugee Protection: Fortresses and Fairness. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Josselson, R. and Lieblich, A. 2003. A framework for narrative research proposals in psychology. In: Josselson, A. et al. eds. Up Close and Personal: The Teaching and Learning of Narrative Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 259–74.
  • Kagan, M. 2011.We live in a country of UNHCR: The UN surrogate state and refugee policy in the Middle East. New Issues in Refugee Research, 201. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/4d5a8cde9/live-country-unhcr-un-surrogate-state-refugee-policy-middle-east-michael.html.
  • Kagan, M. 2013. Why do we still have refugee camps? Available: http://www.urban-refugees.org/debate/why-do-we-still-have-refugee-camps/.
  • Kagan, M. 2014. New Year’s question: Is Human Rights Law useful? Available: https://rsdwatch.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/new-years-question-is-human-rights-law-useful/.
  • Kaiser, T. 2008. Sudanese refugees in Uganda and Kenya. In: Loescher, G. et al. eds. Protracted Refugee Situations. New York: United Nations University Press.
  • Kambela, L. 2016. Angolan refugees in Zambia: Reflecting on local integration as a sustainable solution. Available: https://www.eldis.org/document/A100112.
  • Karadawi, A. 1999. Refugee Policy in Sudan 1967–1984. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Kasim, O. F. and Agbola, T. 2017. Decentralisation and local government reforms in Africa: Challenges, opportunities and the way forward. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 33(1), 89–113.
  • Khan, F. and Lee, M. 2018. Policy shifts in the asylum process in South Africa resulting in hidden refugees and asylum seekers. African Human Mobility Review, 4(2), 1205–25.
  • Khan, F. and Rayner, N. 2020. Country Fiche South Africa. ASILE Project, University of Cape Town. Available: https://www.asileproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Country-Fiche_South-Africa_Final_Pub.pdf.
  • Khan, M. 2010. Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-enhancing Institutions. Draft Working Paper. Available: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/9968/1/Political_Settlements_internet.pdf.
  • Khan, M. 2011. The political settlement and its evolution in Bangladesh. Working Paper. Available: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/12845/1/The_Political_Settlement_and_its_Evolution_in_Bangladesh.pdf.
  • Kibreab, G. 1989. Local settlements in Africa: A misconceived option? Journal of Refugee Studies, 2(4), 468–90.
  • Kibreab, G. 1996. Eritrean and Ethiopian urban refugees in Khartoum: What the eye refuses to see. African Studies Review, 39(3), 131–78.
  • Kibreab, G. 2007. Why governments prefer spatially segregated settlement sites for urban refugees. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 24(1), 27–35.
  • Kihato, C. W. and Landau, L. B. 2016. Stealth humanitarianism: Negotiating politics, precarity, and performance management in protecting the urban displaced. Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(3), 407–25.
  • Kihato, C. W. and Landau, L. B. 2019. The implications of Europe’s ‘containment development’ for African cities. Available: https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/implications-europes-containment-development-african-cities-22988.
  • Klaaren, J. et al. 2008. Talking a new talk: A legislative history of the Refugees Act of 1998. In: Klaaren, J. et al. eds. Advancing Refugee Protection in South Africa (Vol. 2). New York: Berghahn Books, 47–60.
  • Klinck, J. A. 2009. Recognizing socio-economic refugees in South Africa: A principled and rights-based approach to Section 3 (b) of the Refugees Act. International Journal of Refugee Law, 21(4), 653–99.
  • Koelble, T. A. and Siddle, A. 2013. Why decentralization in South Africa has failed. Governance, 26(3), 343–6.
  • Kotef, H. 2015. Movement and the Ordering of Freedom: On Liberal Governances of Mobility. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Krause, U. 2017. Researching forced migration: Critical reflections on research ethics during fieldwork. Oxford RSC, Working Paper Series, 123. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/publications/researching-forced-migration-critical-reflections-on-research-ethics-during-fieldwork
  • Krause, U. and Gato, J. 2019. Escaping humanitarian aid in camps? Rethinking the links between refugees’ encampment, urban self-settlement, coping and peace. Die Friedens-Warte, 92(1–2), 76–97.
  • Kreibaum, M. 2016. Their suffering, our burden? How Congolese refugees affect the Ugandan population. World Development, 78, 262–87.
  • Kuboyama, R. 2008. The transformation from restrictive to selective immigration policy in emerging national competition. Case of Japan in Asia-Pacific region state. Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Development, Working Paper 61. Available: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/35345.
  • Kuch, A. 2016. Naturalization of Burundian refugees in Tanzania: The debates on local integration and the meaning of citizenship revisited. Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(3), 468–87.
  • Kumar, K. 1989. Conducting key informant interviews in developing countries. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=56f46fbe74c67985360c799cc767451a17a78327.
  • Kvale, S. 1996. InterView: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Landau, L. B. 2001. Crisis and authority: A research agenda for exploring political transformation. Available: https://reliefweb.int/report/united-republic-tanzania/crisis-and-authority-research-agenda-exploring-political.
  • Landau, L. B. 2006. Protection and dignity in Johannesburg: Shortcomings of South Africa’s urban refugee policy. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19(3), 308–27.
  • Landau, L. B. 2007. Discrimination and development? Immigration, urbanisation and sustainable livelihoods in Johannesburg. Development Southern Africa, 24(1), 61–76.
  • Landau, L. B. 2011. Introducing the demons. In: Landau, L. B. ed. Exorcising the Demons Within: Xenophobia, Violence and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 1–25.
  • Landau, L. B. 2014. Urban refugees and IDPs. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–50.
  • Landau, L. B. 2018a. Displacement and the pursuit of urban protection: Forced migration, fluidity and global cities. In: Bloch, A. and Dona, G. eds. Forced Migration: Current Issues and Debates. Abingdon: Routledge, 106–25.
  • Landau, L. B. 2018b. A chronotope of containment development: Europe’s migrant crisis and Africa’s reterritorialisation. Antipode, 51(1), 169–86.
  • Landau, L. B. and Amit, R. 2014. Wither policy? Southern African perspectives on understanding law, ‘refugee’ policy and protection. Journal of Refugee Studies, 27(4), 534–52.
  • Landau, L. B. and Freemantle, I. 2017. Shallow solidarities: Space and socialities of accommodation and exclusion in Nairobi and Johannesburg. In: Landau, L. B. and Bakewell, O. eds. Forging African Communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 277–302.
  • Landau, L. B. and Segatti, A.W. K. 2009. Human development impacts of migration: South Africa case study. Human Development Research Paper (HDRP) 5. Available: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/19182/1/MPRA_paper_19182.pdf.
  • Landau, L. B. et al. 2011. Mobility and municipalities: Local authorities, local impacts, and the challenges of movement. In: Segatti, A. and Landau, L. eds. Contemporary Migration to South Africa: A Regional Development Issue. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 81–104.
  • Landau, L. et al. 2016. Becoming Urban Humanitarians: Engaging Local Government to Protect Displaced People. Available: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/84356/Urban%20Institute%20Research%20Report%20-%20Becoming%20Urban%20Humanitarians_FINAL.pdf.
  • Laws, E. 2012. Political Settlements, Elite Pacts and Governments of National Unity. Available: https://www.dlprog.org/publications/research-papers/political-settlements-elite-pacts-and-governments-of-national-unity-a-conceptual-study.
  • Laws, E. and Leftwich, A. 2014. Political settlements. Concept Brief 1. Available: https://www.dlprog.org/publications/research-papers/political-settlements.
  • Lavers, T. and Hickey, S. 2015. Investigating the political economy of social protection expansion in Africa: At the intersection of transnational ideas and domestic politics. Global Development Institute Working Paper Series. The University of Manchester.
  • Leung, G. and Stone, M. 2009. Otherwise than hospitality: A disputation on the relation of ethics to law and politics. Law and Critique, 20(2), 193–206.
  • Levi, M. 1997. A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, 28, 19–41.
  • Levitsky, S. and Way, L. A. 2010. Democracy’s past and future: Why democracy needs a level playing field. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 57–68.
  • Levy, B. et al. 2015. Governance and inequality: Benchmarking and interpreting South Africa’s evolving political settlement. Effective States and Inclusive Development Working Paper Series 51. Available: http://www.effective-states.org/wp-content/uploads/working_papers/final-pdfs/esid_wp_51_levy_hirsch_woolard.pdf.
  • Lewis, C. 2012. UNHCR and International Refugee Law: From Treaties to Innovation. London: Routledge.
  • Lindley, A. 2011. Between a protracted and a crisis situation: Policy responses to Somali refugees in Kenya. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 30(4),14–39.
  • Loescher, G. 1992. Refugee Movements and International Security. International Institute for Strategic Studies. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/05679329208449097.
  • Loescher, G. 2003. UNHCR at fifty: Refugee protection and world politics. In: Steiner, N. et al. eds. Problems of Protection: The UNHCR, Refugees and Human Rights. New York: Routledge, 3–18.
  • Loescher, G. et al. 2008. The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection into the 21st Century. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/publications/the-united-nations-high-commissioner-for-refugees-unhcr-the-politics-and-practice-of-refugee-protection-into-the-21st-century.
  • Long, K. 2009. Early repatriation policy: Russian refugee return 1922–1924. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2), 133–54.
  • Long, K. 2014. Rethinking ‘durable’ solutions. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 475–87.
  • Long, K. 2019. More research and fewer experts: Global governance and international migration. In: Ruhs, M. et al. eds. Bridging the Gaps: Linking Research to Public Debates and Policy Making on Migration and Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 222–40.
  • Long, K. and Crisp, J. 2011. In harm’s way: The irregular movement of migrants to Southern Africa from the Horn and Great Lakes regions. New Issues in Refugee Research, 200. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/4d395af89/harms-way-irregular-movement-migrants-southern-africa-horn-great-lakes.html.
  • Lor, P. J. 2011. International and Comparative Librarianship: Concepts and Methods for Global Studies. Munich: Walter de Gruyter, SAUR.
  • LSE, 2019. Informed Consent. LSE Guidelines, Research Ethics Policy and Procedures. Available: https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/services/Policies-and-procedures/Assets/Documents/infCon.pdf.
  • Mackenzie, C. et al. 2007. Beyond “Do No Harm”: The challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 299–319.
  • Maher, F. A. and Tetreault, M. K. 1994. The Feminist Classroom: Dynamics Of Gender, Race, And Privilege. New York: Basic Books.
  • Mail and Guardian, 2017. ‘No one must be in SA without documentation’ – Mashaba. 30 April. Available: https://mg.co.za/article/2018-04-30-no-one-must-be-in-sa-without-documentation-mashaba/.
  • Mail and Guardian, 2020. Refugees evicted from Cape Town church just want to leave South Africa. 3 March. Available: https://mg.co.za/article/2020-03-03-refugees-evicted-from-cape-town-church-just-want-to-leave-south-africa/.
  • Malkki, L. H. 1992. National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 24–44.
  • Malkki, L. H. 1995. Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.
  • Manby, B. 2016. Citizenship Law in Africa. Cape Town: African Minds.
  • Maple, N. 2016. Rights at risk: A thematic investigation into how states restrict the freedom of movement of refugees on the African Continent. New Issues in Refugee Research, Research 281. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/57ee60d57.pdf.
  • Maple, N. 2018. What’s behind Zambia’s growing welcome to refugees. Refugee Deeply. Available: https://www.newsdeeply.com/refugees/community/2018/06/12/whats-behind-zambias-growing-welcome-to-refugees.
  • Maple, N. 2023. Zimbabwean forced migrants in South Africa: The continual search for solutions to long-term displacement. RLI Blog. Available: https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2023/03/01/zimbabwean-forced-migrants-in-south-africa-the-continual-search-for-solutions-to-long-term-displacement/.
  • Maple, N., Reardon-Smith, S. and Black, R. 2021. Immobility and the containment of solutions: Reflections on the global compacts, mixed migration and the transformation of protection. Interventions, 23(2), 326–47.
  • Maple, N., Walker, R. and Vearey, J. 2021. COVID-19 and Migration Governance in Africa. Researching Migration and Coronavirus in Southern Africa Paper, 1, June 2021. Available: https://www.mahpsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/MiCoSA-Covid19-and-migration-governance-in-Africa-OccasionalPaper-2-June2021.pdf.
  • Maple, N., et al., 2023. The influence of the global refugee regime in Africa: Still ‘Akin to a distant weather pattern’? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42(3), 247–58.
  • Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117.
  • Martin, D. 2015. From spaces of exception to ‘campscapes’: Palestinian refugee camps and informal settlements in Beirut. Political Geography, 44, 9–18.
  • Martini, M. 2014. Approaches to curbing corruption in tax administration in Africa. Department for International Development. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a089a640f0b652dd000336/answer-2014-11.pdf.
  • Masuku, S. and Nkala, S. 2018. Patterns of the refugee cycle in Africa: A hazardous cycle with no end in sight? Journal of African Union Studies, 7(3), 87–105.
  • Mayblin, L. and Turner, J. 2020. Migration Studies and Colonialism. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Maystadt, J. F. and Verwimp, P. 2014. Winners and losers among a refugee-hosting population. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62(4), 769–809.
  • Mbembe, A. 2018. The idea of a borderless world. Available: https://africasacountry.com/2018/11/the-idea-of-a-borderless-world.
  • McGahan, K. 2009. The securitization of migration in Malaysia. APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1449344
  • Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Meyer, S. 2006. The ‘refugee aid and development’ approach in Uganda: Empowerment and self-reliance of refugees in practice. New Issues in Refugee Research, 131. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/4538eb172/refugee-aid-development-approach-uganda-empowerment-self-reliance-refugees.html.
  • Mfubu, P. 2018. What does the 2017 Refugee Amendment Act mean for asylum seekers and refugees living in South Africa? Available: https://www.saferspaces.org.za/blog/entry/what-does-the-2017-refugee-amendment-act-mean-for-asylum-seekers-and-refuge.
  • Miller, T. and Bell, L. 2002. Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. Ethics in Qualitative Research, 53, 61–75.
  • Milner, J. 2000. Sharing the security burden: Towards the convergence of refugee protection and state security. Oxford RSC, Working Paper Series, 4. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp4-sharing-the-security-burden-2000.pdf.
  • Milner, J. 2009. Refugees, the State and the Politics of Asylum in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Minca, C. 2015. Counter-camps and other spatialities. Political Geography, 49(90), 90–92.
  • Misago, J. P. 2016. Responding to xenophobic violence in post-apartheid South Africa: Barking up the wrong tree? African Human Mobility Review, 2(2), 443–67.
  • Misago, J. P., Monson, T., Polzer, T., and Landau, L. B. 2010. Violence against Foreign Nationals in South Africa: Understanding Causes and Evaluating Responses. Johannesburg: CoRMSA.
  • Montclos, M. and Kagwanja, P. M. 2000. Refugee camps or cities? The socio-economic dynamics of the Dadaab and Kakuma camps in Northern Kenya. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(2), 205–22.
  • Mourad, L. and Norman, K. P. 2019. Transforming refugees into migrants: Institutional change and the politics of international protection. European Journal of International Relations, 26(3), 687–713.
  • Moyo, I. 2018. Zimbabwean dispensation, special and exemption permits in South Africa: On humanitarian logic, depoliticisation and invisibilisation of migrants. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(8), 1141–57.
  • Moyo, I. 2020. On borders and the liminality of undocumented Zimbabwean migrants in South Africa. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 18(1), 60–74.
  • Moyo, K. and Botha, C. 2022. Refugee policy as infrastructure: The gulf between policy intent and implementation for refugees and asylum seekers in South Africa. In: Rugunanan, P. and Xulu-Gama, N. eds. Migration in Southern Africa. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 77–89.
  • Moyo, K., Sebba, K. R. and Zanker, F. 2021. Who is watching? Refugee protection during a pandemic – responses from Uganda and South Africa, Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 1–19.
  • Moyo, K. and Zanker, F., 2020. Political Contestations within South African Migration Governance. Freiburg: Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institute. Available: https://www.arnold-bergstraesser.de/sites/default/files/political_contestations_within_south_african_migration_governance_moyo_and_zanker.pdf.
  • Mthembu-Salter, G. et al. 2014. Counting the cost of securitising South Africa’s immigration regime. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a089d240f0b652dd000416/WP20_Mthembu-Salter.pdf.
  • Muggah, R. ed. 2009. Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the Aftermath of War. New York: Routledge.
  • Muggah, R. and Kilcullen, D. 2016. These are Africa’s fastest-growing cities – and they’ll make or break the continent. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/05/africa-biggest-cities-fragility/.
  • Mulaudzi, M. 2015. The missing link: State capacity, service delivery and the politics of the developmental state in South Africa. Thesis, University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
  • Müller-Funk, L. 2021. Research with refugees in fragile political contexts: How ethical reflections impact methodological choices. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 2308–32.
  • Murtagh, L. 2007. Implementing a critically quasi-ethnographic approach. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 193–215.
  • Musuva, C. K. 2015. International migration, xenophobia and the South African state. PhD Dissertation, Stellenbosch University.
  • Mutesa, F. and Nchito, W. 2003. Human Security and Poverty Reduction in Zambia. Lusaka: University of Zambia Press.
  • Nancy, J. 2000. Being Singular Plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Neimeyer, R. A. and Levitt, H. 2001. Constructivism/constructionism: methodology. In: Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 724–8.
  • Neto, P. F. 2019. Displacement, refuge and urbanisation. From refugee camps to ecovillages. Planning Theory and Practice, 20(1), 123–6.
  • Newhouse, L. S. 2015. More than mere survival: Violence, humanitarian governance, and practical material politics in a Kenyan refugee camp. Environment and Planning A, 47(11), 2292–307.
  • Newman, E. 2003. Refugees, international security, and human vulnerability: Introduction and survey. In: Newman, E. and Van Selm, J. eds. Refugees and Forced Displacement. International Security, Human Vulnerability, and the State. Tokyo: UN University Press, 3–30.
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E. and Moules, N. J. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
  • Nshimbi, C. C. and Fioramonti, L. 2014. The will to integrate: South Africa’s responses to regional migration from the SADC region. African Development Review, 26(S1), 52–63.
  • Nyers, P. 2006. The accidental citizen: Acts of sovereignty and (un)making citizenship. Economy and Society, 35(1), 22–41.
  • O’Driscoll, D. 2017. Managing Risks in Securitisation of Refugees. K4D Report. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a5f313ced915d7dfb57d029/224_Managing_risks_in_securitisation_of_refugees.pdf.
  • Obi, C. I. 2010. African migration as the search for a wonderful world: An emerging trans-global security threat? African and Asian Studies, 9(1/2), 128–48.
  • Ochieng, V. A. 2023. An exploration of economic resilience among refugees and former refugees in Zambia. MSc Dissertation, University of London.
  • OECD. 2017. Who bears the cost of integrating refugees? Available: https://www.oecd.org/els/mig/migration-policy-debates-13.pdf.
  • Oelgemöller, C. 2017. The Evolution of Migration Management in the Global North. London: Routledge.
  • Okoth-Obbo, G. 2001. Thirty years on: A legal review of the 1969 OAU Refugee Convention governing the specific aspects of refugee problems in Africa. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 20(1), 79–138.
  • Omata, N. 2017. The Myth of Self-Reliance: Economic Lives Inside a Liberian Refugee Camp. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Omata, N. 2019. ‘Over-researched’ and ‘under-researched’ refugees. Forced Migration Review, 61. Available: https://www.fmreview.org/ethics/omata.
  • Omata, N. and Kaplan, J. D. 2013. Refugee livelihoods in Kampala, Nakivale and Kyangwali refugee settlements: Patterns of engagement with the private sector. RSC, Working Paper Series, 80. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp95-refugee-livelihoods-kampala-nakivale-kyangwali-2013.pdf.
  • Onuoha, G. 2008. Resources and Development. The Role of the State in Sub-Saharan Africa. Occasional Paper No 58. Johannesburg: Institute for Global Dialogue (IGD).
  • Osmers, J. 2015. Cessation of Rwandan refugee status: Two years on. Available: http://www.pambazuka.org/human-security/cessation-rwandan-refugee-status-two-years
  • Owens, P. 2009. Reclaiming ‘bare life’? Against Agamben on refugees. International Relations, 23(4), 567–82.
  • Palmary, I. 2002. Refugees, Safety and Xenophobia in South African Cities: The Role of Local Government. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. Available: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/104945/refugeessafteyand.pdf
  • Parilla, J. and Trujillo, J. L. 2015. South Africa’s global gateway: Profiling the Gauteng City-Region’s international competitiveness and connections. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/GCI_Johannesburg_Nov16REVfinal_LowRes-1.pdf.
  • Parliamentary Monitoring Group (PMG). 2021. Refugee bodies on their work and challenges concerning refugees and asylum seekers; with Minister and Deputy Minister, PMG, 02 March 2021. Available: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/32404/.
  • Pasquetti, S. and Picker, G. 2017. Urban informality and confinement: Toward a relational framework. International Sociology, 32(4), 532–44.
  • Pavanello, S. et al. 2010. Hidden and exposed: Urban refugees in Nairobi, Kenya. ODI Humanitarian Policy Group Working Paper. Available: http://cdn-odi-production.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/media/documents/5858.pdf.
  • Phiri, C. 2016. Is Zambia sliding away from the beacon of peace stand? Available: https://thezambian.com/news/2016/07/12/is-zambia-sliding-away-from-the-beacon-of-peace-stand/.
  • Pitt-Rivers, J. 2012. The law of hospitality. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 501–17.
  • Pittaway, E. et al. 2010. ‘Stop stealing our stories’: The ethics of research with vulnerable groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(2), 229–51.
  • Polzer, T. 2007. Adapting to changing legal frameworks: Mozambican refugees in South Africa. International Journal of Refugee Law, 19, 22–50.
  • Polzer, T. 2009. Negotiating rights: The politics of local integration. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 92–106.
  • Polzer, T. and Segatti, A. 2011. From defending migrant rights to new political subjectivities: Gauteng migrants’ organisations after May 2008. In: Landau, L. B. ed. Exorcising the Demons Within: Xenophobia, Violence and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 200–225.
  • Porter, L. et al. 2019. Borders and refuge: Citizenship, mobility and planning in a volatile world. Planning Theory and Practice, 20(1), 99–128.
  • Portes, A. and Böröcz, J. 1989. Contemporary immigration: Theoretical perspectives on its determinants and modes of incorporation. International Migration Review, 23(3), 606–30.
  • Portes, A. and Landolt, P. 1996. The Downside of Social Capital. Washington, DC: The American Prospect. Available: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/67453.
  • Portes, A. and Rumbaut, R. G. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Pratt, B. and Loizos, P. 2003. Choosing research methods: Data collection for development workers. Oxfam Development Guidelines, 7. Available: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/choosing-research-methods-data-collection-for-development-workers-115358/
  • Pugh, J. 2011. UNHCR and refugee rights protection in Ecuador: The effects of non-state institutional innovation on peacebuilding and human security. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1900446.
  • Punch, S. 2016. Exploring children’s agency across majority and minority world contexts, reconceptualising agency and childhood. New Perspectives in Childhood Studies, (2)22, 183–96.
  • Punton, M. and Shepherd, A. 2015. What is chronic poverty? Findings from the Chronic Poverty Research Centre, ODI. Available: https://www.odi.org/publications/10485-what-chronic-poverty-findings-chronic-poverty-research-centre.
  • Quak, E. J. 2019. Opposition political party approaches and international assistance against democratic backsliding. Institute of Development Studies. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c8647f740f0b636938a0ec1/534_Opposition_Political_Parties_Approaches_in_Non-Democratic_Settings.pdf.
  • Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Rahal, M. and White, B. T. 2022. UNHCR and the Algerian War of Independence: Postcolonial sovereignty and the globalization of the international refugee regime, 1954–63, Journal of Global History, 17(2), 331–52.
  • Ramadan, A. 2013. Spatialising the refugee camp. Transnational Institute of British Geography, 38(1), 65–77.
  • Ravenhill, J. 1990. The north-south balance of power. International Affairs, 66(4), 731–48.
  • Ravitch, S. M. and Riggan, M. 2016. Reason and Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research. London: Sage.
  • Reed, K. and Schenck, M. C. eds. 2023. The Right to Research: Historical Narratives by Refugee and Global South Researchers. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Refugee Studies Centre, 2007. Ethical guidelines for good research practice. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 26(3), 162–72.
  • ReliefWeb. 2010. 300 Zimbabweans arriving in SA daily. Available: https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/300-zimbabweans-arriving-sa-daily-msf.
  • Renzetti, C. and Lee, R. eds. 1993. Researching Sensitive Topics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Republic of Zambia. 2022. Statement by Zambia, to the 73rd Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme (Excom). Republic of Zambia, October 2022. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/in/sites/en-in/files/legacy-pdf/634437ad7.pdf.
  • Reus-Smit. C. 2005. Constructivism. In: Burchill, S. et al. eds. Theories of International Relations. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan International Higher Education, 188–212.
  • Richards, L. and Richards, T. 1994. From filing cabinet to computer. In: Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. eds. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge, 146–72.
  • Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Rudestam, K. E. and Newton, R. R. 2007. Surviving your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Ruiz, I. and Vargas-Silva, C. 2015. The labor market impacts of forced migration. American Economic Review, 105(5), 581–6.
  • Rutinwa, B. 1999. The end of asylum? The changing nature of refugee policies in Africa. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper, 5. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/3ae6a0c34/end-asylum-changing-nature-refugee-policies-africa-bonaventure-rutinwa.html.
  • Rutinwa, B. 2002. Asylum and refugee policies in Southern Africa: A historical perspective. In: Legal Resources Foundation, A Reference Guide to Refugee Law and Issues in Southern Africa. Lusaka: Legal Resources Foundation. Available: https://sarpn.org/EventPapers/april2002_imp/rutinwa/rutinwa.pdf
  • SAgov, 2020. Local government. Available at: https://www.gov.za/about-government/government-system/local-government.
  • Samaddar, R. 2018. Promises and paradoxes of a global gaze. CRG Series on Policies and Practices, 98, 1–23. Available: http://www.mcrg.ac.in/PP98.pdf.
  • Sanyal, R. 2014. Urbanizing refuge: Interrogating spaces of displacement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 558–72.
  • Sanyal, R. 2017. A no-camp policy: Interrogating informal settlements in Lebanon. Geoforum, 84, 117–25.
  • Sanyal, R. 2019. Planning for refugees in cities. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(1), 99–128.
  • Sarkar, A. 2017. Displacement and the City. World Peace Foundation, Reinventing Peace. Available: https://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2017/03/10/displacement-and-the-city/.
  • Sassen, S. 1999. Whose city is it? In: Foo, A. F. et al. eds. Sustainable Cities in the 21st century. Singapore: NUS Press, 145–63.
  • Saunders, M. et al. 2007. Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  • Saunders, N. 2014. Paradigm shift or business as usual? An historical reappraisal of the ‘shift’ to securitisation of refugee protection. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 33(3), 69–92.
  • Scalabrini, 2021. Angola Special Permit Update, Scalabrini Centre of Cape Town, 17 August 2021. Available: https://www.scalabrini.org.za/news/angola-special-permit-update/.
  • Scalettaris, G. 2009. Refugees and mobility. Forced Migration Review, 33, 58–9.
  • Schmidt, A. 2003. Camps versus Settlements. Forced Immigration. Available: https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/SCHMIDT%202003%20Camps%20vs%20Settlements.pdf.
  • Schmidt, A. 2014. Status determination and recognition. In: Betts, A. and Orchard, P. eds. Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 248–68.
  • Schoenberger, E. 1991. The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography. The Professional Geographer, 43(2), 180–89.
  • Schwella, E. 2016. Federalism in South Africa: A complex context and continued challenges. In: Buhler et al. eds. Federalism – a Success Story? Munich: Hanns Seidel Foundation, 73–102.
  • Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
  • Seekings, J. and Nattrass, N. 2005. Race, Class and Inequality in South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Segatti, A. W. 2011. Reforming South African immigration policy in the post-apartheid period (1990–2006): What it means and what it takes. In: Segatti, A. W. and Landau, L. B. eds. Migration in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Challenges and Questions to Policy-Makers. Research Department, AFD, 32–6. Available: https://www.migration.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Migration-in-Postapartheid-South-Africa-Challenges-and-Questions-to-Policy-Makers.pdf.
  • Segatti, A. W. 2013. Migration to South Africa: Regional challenges versus national instruments and interests. In: Segatti, A. W. and Landau, L. B. eds. Contemporary Migration to South Africa: A Regional Development Issue. Washington, DC: World Bank, 9–27.
  • Seidman-Zager, J. 2010. The securitization of asylum: Protecting UK residents. Oxford RSC, Working Paper Series, 57. Available: https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp57-securitization-of-asylum-2010.pdf.
  • Sewell, M. 1998. The Use of Qualitative Interviews in Evaluation. Tucson: University of Arizona. Available: https://cals.arizona.edu/sfcs/cyfernet/cyfar/Intervu5.htm.
  • Shapcott, R. 2010. International Ethics: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Sharpe, M. 2018. The Regional Law of Refugee Protection in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Siachiwena, H. 2021a. A Silent Revolution. Journal of African Elections, 20(2), 32–56.
  • Siachiwena, H. 2021b. The good the bad and the alarming: Hichilemas first 100 days in Zambia. African Arguments. 2 December 2021. Available: https://africanarguments.org/2021/12/the-good-the-bad-and-the-alarming-hichilemas-first-100-days-in-zambia/.
  • Sin, C. H. 2005. Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice. Sociology, 39(2), 277–94.
  • Slaughter, A. and Crisp, J. 2008. A surrogate state? The role of UNHCR in protracted refugee situations. In: Loescher, G. et al. eds. Protracted Refugee Situations. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 123–40.
  • Smit, W. and Pieterse, D. E. 2014. Decentralisation and institutional reconfiguration in urban Africa. In: Pieterse, D. E. and Parnell, S. eds. Africa’s Urban Revolution. London: Zed Books, 148–66.
  • Smith, M. 2004. Warehousing refugees: A denial of rights, a waste of humanity. World Refugee Survey, 38, 38–56.
  • Smith, T. R. 2003. The making of the South African (1998) Refugees Act. Forced Migration Studies Programme Working Paper Series 5. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
  • Somerville, K. 2017. Africa’s Long Road Since Independence: The Many Histories of a Continent. London: Penguin Books.
  • Sommers, M. 1999. Urbanization and its discontents: Urban refugees in Tanzania. Forced Migration Review, 4, 22–4.
  • Sommers, M. 2001. Young, male and Pentecostal: Urban refugees in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Refugee Studies, 14(4), 347–70.
  • Spiggle, S. 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.
  • Spradley, J. 1979. Asking descriptive questions. The Ethnographic Interview, 1, 44–61.
  • Squire, V. 2011. From community cohesion to mobile solidarities: The City of Sanctuary network and the Strangers into Citizens campaign. Political Studies, 59, 290–307.
  • Stake, R. E. 2003. Case studies. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 119–50.
  • Statistics South Africa. 2012. Census 2011: Census in brief. Pretoria. Available: http://www.statssa.gov.za/census/census_2011/census_products/Census_2011_Census_in_brief.pdf.
  • Stedman, S. J. and Tanner, F. 2004. Refugee Manipulation: War, Politics, and the Abuse of Human Suffering. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Stein, B. and Clark, L. 1990. Refugee integration and older refugee settlements in Africa. A paper presented at the 1990 meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, Michigan State University. Available: https://msu.edu/course/pls/461/stein/FINAL.html.
  • Stevens, J. 2006. Prisons of the stateless. The derelictions of UNCHR. New Left Review, 42, 53–67.
  • Straus, S. 2012. Wars do end! Changing patterns of political violence in sub-Saharan Africa. African Affairs, 111(443), 179–201.
  • Stronks, M. C. 2012. The question of Salah Sheekh: Derrida’s hospitality and migration law. International Journal of Law in Context, 8(1), 73–95.
  • Sturridge, C. 2011. Mobility and durable solutions: A case study of Afghan and Somali refugees. New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No 204. Geneva: UNHCR. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/research/working/4d7657899/mobility-durable-solutions-case-study-afghan-somali-refugees-caitlin-sturridge.html.
  • Subulwa, A. G. 2013. Settlement, protracted displacement, and repatriation at Mayukwayukwa in western Zambia. African Geographical Review, 32(1), 29–43.
  • Subulwa, A. G. 2019. Urban refugees. In: Orum, A. et al. eds. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Wiley Online Library. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0542.
  • Tati, G. 2008. The immigration issues in the post-apartheid South Africa: Discourses, policies and social repercussions. Space Populations Societies, 3, 423–40.
  • Tesfai, A and de Gruchy, T. 2021. Migration and Covid-19: New and continuing concerns with South Africa’s response to the pandemic, MiCoSA Issue Brief 4. African Centre for Migration and Society. Available: https://www.mahpsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/MiCoSA-Issue-brief4-new-continuing-concerns-with-SAs-response-to-the-pandemic.pdf.
  • Thebe, V. 2017. ‘Two steps forward, one step back’: Zimbabwean migration and South Africa’s regularising programme. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18(2), 613–22.
  • Thorne, S. 2000. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3, 68–70.
  • Thorsen, K.T. 2016. Field Report from Visit to Meheba Refugee Settlement in North Western Province of Zambia. Oslo: Refugee Alliance.
  • Travers, M. 2001. Qualitative Research through Case Studies. London: Sage.
  • Tsourapas, G. 2019. How migration deals lead to refugee commodification. Refugees Deeply. Available: https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/refugees/community/2019/02/13/how-migration-deals-lead-to-refugee-commodification.
  • Turner, S. 2016. What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(2), 139–48.
  • UNCDF. 2018. Can digitization of social cash transfers improve the lives of refugees in Zambia? Available: https://www.uncdf.org/article/3347/article-can-digitization-of-social-cash-transfers-improve-the-lives-of-refugees-in-zambia.
  • UNGA. 2016. 71/1. New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 September 2016. General Assembly, 3 October 2016 A/RES/71/1. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/57e39d987.
  • UNGA. 2018. 13 September 2018 Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Part II Global Compact on Refugees. General Assembly, 13 September 2018. A/73/12 (Part II). Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/report-united-nations-high-commissioner-refugees-part-ii-global-compact-refugees.
  • UN-Habitat, 2012. Fiscal Decentralisation in Zambia. The Global Urban Economic Dialogue Series. Available: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/Fiscal%20Decentralisation%20in%20Zambia.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 1994. Activities Financed by Voluntary Funds: Report for 1993–1994 and Proposed Budget Programmes and Budget for 1995. Section 23 – Zambia. UN General Assembly. Available: http://www.unhcr.org/4de638d99.html.
  • UNHCR. 1997. The State of the World’s Refugees: A Humanitarian Agenda. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • UNHCR. 2004. Addressing Irregular Secondary Movements of Refugees and Asylum-seekers. UNHCR Convention Plus Issues Paper. Available: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/471de35b2.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2005. Handbook For Self Reliance. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/44bf7b012.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2006a. Angolan Repatriation from Zambia Resumes for Final Year. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/latest/2006/8/44e1e4faa/angolan-repatriation-zambia-resumes-final-year.html.
  • UNHCR, 2006b. State of the World’s Refugees 2006. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/publications/sowr/4a4dc1a89/state-worlds-refugees-2006-human-displacement-new-millennium.html.
  • UNHCR. 2009. UNHCR Policy on Refugee Protection and Solutions in Urban Areas. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/protection/hcdialogue%20/4ab356ab6/unhcr-policy-refugee-protection-solutions-urban-areas.html.
  • UNHCR. 2012. Zambia Begins Granting Angolan Refugees Permanent Residency. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/latest/2012/12/50e162899/zambia-begins-granting-angolan-refugees-permanent-residency.html.
  • UNHCR. 2014a. UNHCR Policy on Alternatives to Camps. Available: http://www.refworld.org/docid/5423ded84.html.
  • UNHCR. 2014b. Strategic Framework for the Local Integration of Former Refugees in Zambia. UNHCR. Available: https://docplayer.net/12344584-Strategic-framework-for-the-local-integration-of-former-refugees-in-zambia.html.
  • UNHCR. 2015a. Statistical Yearbook 2014, 14th edition. Available: http://www.unhcr.org/uk/statistics/country/566584fc9/unhcr-statistical-yearbook-2014-14th-edition.html.
  • UNHCR. 2015b. UNHCR Global Appeal 2015 Update. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/unhcr-global-appeal-2015-update-populations-concern-unhcr.
  • UNHCR. 2015c. Onward Movement of Asylum Seekers and Refugees, in Discussion Paper prepared for the Expert Roundtable on Onward Movement Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Geneva, 1–2 October 2015. Available: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/563080eb4.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2016a. Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2015. UNHCR. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/unhcr-global-trends-2015
  • UNHCR. 2016b. On Eve of South Sudan 5th Anniversary, Forced Displacement Continues to Rise. Available: http://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/briefing/2016/7/577f6b0c16/eve-south-sudan-5th-anniversary-forced-displacement-continues-rise.html.
  • UNHCR. 2017a. Submission by the UNHCR For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Compilation Report. Universal Periodic Review: 3rd Cycle, 28th Session. Zambia. Available: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a12ae242.html.
  • UNHCR. 2017b. UNHCR Global Report, Global Summaries, Africa. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/publications/fundraising/5b30b9d07/unhcr-global-report-2017-africa-regional-summary.html.
  • UNHCR. 2018a. Highlighted Underfunded Situations. Available: https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/UNHCR%20Brochure%20on%20Underfunded%20Situations%20-%20September%202018.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2018b. UNHCR Turkey Factsheet. Available: https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/unhcr-turkey-factsheet-august-2018.
  • UNHCR. 2018c. UNHCR Global Report, Global Summaries, Africa. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/the-global-report.html.
  • UNHCR. 2019a. Zambia / Global Focus. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/4c0903ca9.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2019b. Burundi Situation. Available: https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/69972.
  • UNHCR. 2019c. Southern Africa. UNHCR Global Report 2019, 82–5. Available: https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/gr2019/pdf/GR2019_English_Full_lowres.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2019d. Africa Bureau Director’s Speech, March Standing Committee, 2019. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/5c80fa944.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2020. Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2019. Geneva: UNHCR. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/flagship-reports/globaltrends/globaltrends2019/#:~:text=At%20the%20end%20of%202019%2C%20Syrians%20continued%20to%20be%20by,six%20million%20internally%20displaced%20people).
  • UNHCR, 2021a. Work to Revamp the Asylum System Begins in South Africa, UNHCR Press Release, 8 March 2021. Available: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Press%20Release_UNHCR_Work%20begins%20to%20revamp%20the%20asylum%20system%20in%20South%20Africa_08Mar21.pdf.
  • UNHCR. 2021b. Country Strategy Evaluation: Zambia. UNHCR Final Report, December 2021. Available: https://reliefweb.int/report/zambia/unhcr-country-strategy-evaluation-zambia-final-report-december-2021.
  • UNHCR. 2022. Operational Update, Zambia. UNHCR, September 2022. Available: https://reporting.unhcr.org/zambia-operational-update.
  • UNHCR. 2023a. Regional Factual Sheet: Southern Africa. UNHCR. May 2023. Available: https://reporting.unhcr.org/southern-africa-factsheet-5195.
  • UNHCR. 2023b. South Africa. UNHCR. May 2023. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/countries/south-africa.
  • USDS, 2023. 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia. U.S. Department of State. Available: https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/zambia.
  • Vale, P. 2002. The movement, modernity and new international relations writing in South Africa. International Affairs, 78(3), 585–93.
  • Vale, P. and Taylor, I. 1999. South Africa’s post-apartheid foreign policy five years on – from pariah state to ‘just another country’? The Round Table, 88(352), 629–34.
  • Van Amersfoort, H. and Van Niekerk, M. 2006. Immigration as a colonial inheritance: Post-colonial immigrants in the Netherlands, 1945–2002. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 323–46.
  • van der Waldt, G. 2020. Constructing conceptual frameworks in social science research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 16(1), 1–9.
  • van Garderen, J. 2004. Refugee protection in Africa. Human Rights Law in Africa Online, 1(1), 839–42.
  • van Garderen, J. and Ebenstein, J. 2011. Regional Developments: Africa. In: Zimmerman, A. ed. The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–203.
  • Van Hear, N. 1998. Report. Refugee protection and immigration control: Addressing the asylum dilemma. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 17(3), 1–27.
  • Van Noorloos, F. and Kloosterboer, M. 2018. Africa’s new cities: The contested future of urbanisation. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1223–41.
  • Varsanyi, M. W. 2006. Interrogating ‘urban citizenship’ vis-à-vis undocumented migration. Citizenship Studies, 10(2), 229–49.
  • Vearey, J. 2017. Urban health in Johannesburg: Migration, exclusion and inequality. Urban Forum, 28(1), 1–4.
  • Vearey, J. et al. 2017. Analysing local-level responses to migration and urban health in Hillbrow: The Johannesburg Migrant Health Forum. BMC Public Health, 17(3), 89–93.
  • Verdirame, G. and Harrell-Bond, B. 2005. Rights in Exile. Janus-faced Humanitarianism. Studies in Forced Migration, 17. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Verdirame, G. and Pobjoy, J. 2013. A Rejoinder. Urban Refugee.Org. Available: http://urban-refugees.org/debate/rejoinder/.
  • Veroff, J. 2010a. Crimes, conflicts and courts: The administration of justice in a Zambian refugee settlement. New Issues in Refugee Research, 192. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/4cd7bfa99/crimes-conflicts-courts-administration-justice-zambian-refugee-settlement.html.
  • Veroff, J. 2010b. Justice administration in Meheba refugee settlement: Refugee perceptions, preferences, and strategic decisions. PhD Thesis, Oxford University.
  • Vigneswaran, D. 2008. A foot in the door: Access to asylum in South Africa. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 25(2), 41–52.
  • Vigneswaran, D. and Quirk, J. 2015. Mobility Makes States: Migration and Power in Africa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Waldinger, R. 2001. Strangers at the Gate: New Immigrants in Urban America. Oakland: University of California Press.
  • Walker, K. E. 2014. The role of geographic context in the local politics of US immigration. Journal of Ethnics and Migration Studies, 40, 1040–59.
  • Ward, P. 2014. Refugee cities: Reflections on the development and impact of UNHCR urban refugee policy in the Middle East. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 33(1), 77–93.
  • Washinyira, T. 2022. Refugees left in limbo without protection as they battle to renew asylum documents through home affairs online system. Daily Maverick, 4 February 2022. Available: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-02-04-refugees-left-in-limbo-without-protection-as-they-battle-to-renew-asylum-documents-through-home-affairs-online-system/.
  • WEF. 2017. Migration and Its Impact on Cities. World Economic Forum report. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/migration-and-its-impact-on-cities.
  • Weiner, M., 1992. Security, stability, and international migration. International Security, 17(3), 91–126.
  • Whitaker, B. E. 1999. Disjuncutured Boundaries. PhD Thesis, University of North Carolina.
  • Whitaker, B. E. 2002. Refugees in Western Tanzania: The distribution of burdens and benefits among local hosts. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(4), 339–58.
  • Wilhelm-Solomon, M. 2017. The ruinous vitalism of the urban form: Ontological orientations in inner-city Johannesburg. Critical African Studies, 9(2), 174–91.
  • Williamson. R. 2015. Towards a multi-scalar methodology: The challenges of studying social transformation and international migration. In: Castles, S. et al. eds. Social Transformation and Migration: National and Local Experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–32.
  • Wittenberg, M. 2003. Decentralisation in South Africa. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
  • WorldAtlas. 2019. Geography Statistics of Zambia. Available: https://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/africa/zambia/zmlandst.htm.
  • World Bank. 2018a. Mixed Migration, Forced Displacement and Job Outcomes in South Africa. Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/247261530129173904/main-report.
  • World Bank. 2018b. Overcoming Poverty and Inequality in South Africa: An Assessment of Drivers, Constraints and Opportunities. Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/530481521735906534/Overcoming-Poverty-and-Inequality-in-South-Africa-An-Assessment-of-Drivers-Constraints-and-Opportunities.
  • World Bank. 2019. New Country Partnership Framework to Support Zambia Achieve Inclusive Growth. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/02/14/new-country-partnership-framework-to-support-zambia-achieve-inclusive-growth.
  • World Vision et al., 2019. Summary Report of Online Meeting on Advancing Local Integration in Zambia. World Vision, ICVA and UNHCR, 17 June 2021. Available: https://globalcompactrefugees.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Summary-Report_Zambia-LI_Meeting_17%20June%202021.pdf.
  • Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
  • Zanker, F. 2019. Managing or restricting movement? Diverging approaches of African and European migration governance. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1–18.
  • Zanker, F. L. and Moyo, K. 2020. The Corona virus and migration governance in South Africa: Business as usual? Africa Spectrum, 55(1), 100–112.
  • Zetter, R. 2015. Protection in Crisis: Forced Migration and Protection in a Global Era. Migration Policy Institute. Available: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/protection-crisis-forced-migration-and-protection-global-era.
  • Zetter, R. and Deikun, G. 2010. Meeting humanitarian challenges in urban areas. Forced Migration Review, 34, 5–8.
  • Zetter, R. and Ruaudel, H. 2016. Refugees’ right to work and access to labor markets – An assessment. The KNOMAD Working Paper Series. Available: https://www.knomad.org/publication/refugees-right-work-and-access-labor-markets-assessment-part-1.
  • Zieck, M. 2018. Refugees and the right to freedom of movement: From flight to return. Michigan Journal of International Law, 39, 19–119.
  • Ziegler, R. 2020. Access to effective refugee protection in South Africa: Legislative commitment, policy realities, judicial rectifications? Constitutional Court Review, 10(1), 65–106.
  • Zolberg, A. R. et al. 1989. Escape from Violence: Conflict and the Refugee Crisis in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Index
PreviousNext
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org